Reviews for DeArrow - Better Titles and Thumbnails on YouTube
DeArrow - Better Titles and Thumbnails on YouTube by Ajay (SponsorBlock)
273 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by EliteCanadian, a day agoI created an account with Firefox in order to review this outstanding extension. Ajay, thank you for helping with the overwhelming lack of ethics within "creators"
My favorite part (and the main reason for this review) is that it was a LTT thumbnail that made me reinstall this, Linus's thumbnails are the biggest clickbait, but to see LTT featured on this MAIN SHAMING PAGE, love it.
Highly recommended to anyone that's sick and tired of "creators" abusing their followers. - Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18747889, a day agoTells you to activate and there's no option to get free access as the page doesn't work
"An error occurred during a connection to dearrow.ajay.app."
e/ I'd suggest allowing access to addon in some way without connecting to a website so that the addon is usable for people facing similar issueDeveloper response
posted a day agoIt sounds like something on your network is disallowing connections to dearrow.ajay.app
If you aren't able to use the free access system, try using this key: Fbmzg-7c642 - Rated 4 out of 5by Tyrand, 4 days agoNot nearly as useful as SponsorBlock.
Perfectly adequate not-clickbait titles keep getting changed into generic titles
Takes too many clicks to downvote a bad title. - Rated 5 out of 5by Killerhurtz, 15 days ago15 seconds into the free 60 minute trial and my youtube front page was already so much more pleasant that I sprung for the $1 license.
I expected nothing less from the dev of SponsorBlock :) - Rated 5 out of 5by gorp, 17 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18715530, 21 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by RainbuDeer, 21 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18714554, 22 days agoVery helpful, you thought of everything and more. I will be donating when I am able to, fantastic work from everyone who worked on this
- Rated 5 out of 5by malau, a month agoIt's by the Sponsorblock guy, so you already know it's going to be good.
The only problem is it relies on people to actually make the effort to change a title - which it seems not a lot of people have bothered to do (so far).
It also relies on the good will of someone who has to be the canary in the cage who watches the clickbait in the first place.
I don't know how open it is to abuse ? Is there something to stop someone (or even a rival channel ?) from just trashing a channel's titles ?
Anyway, a great idea, that will hopefully take off once more people become aware of it. (I only became aware of it because Sponsorblock had stopped working and I had to go to the settings and saw the button for it - so maybe a one time Sponsorblock popup would be a good idea ? ) - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13483122, a month ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by 00yunje, a month agoDepending on who you're subscribed to, this might not make much impact on your browsing experience. Due to titles being crowd-sourced, not every video will be equally affected. Sometimes, the suggested titles can get REALLY pedantic for otherwise perfectly serviceable titles. For example, "The History of The Simpsons Hit & Run World Records" by Summoning Salt became... "The History of The Simpsons Hit & Run (All Story Missions) World Records". Like, that's *barely* more information, and it's stuff I think most people would've assumed anyway from the original title. However, in both cases I've seen this happen, they've reverted back to the original titles soon after. (There's not even a record of there ever being a proposed title, so you're just gonna have to trust me that they were there. I know what I saw.)
Generally, they make the biggest difference with channels like Kurzgesagt or Tom Scott, creators they specifically showcase in the screenshots. Titles can be a bit of a mixed bag for others, but more for the fact that not every video - that might need a retitle - will get them. The generic thumbnail replacer makes the bigger difference to me, imo. It just gives you an honest impression of what each video's gonna look like, literally. And it's nice not having to deal with the obnoxious, gaudy thumbnails people put out sometimes.
Despite the occasionally questionable re-titles, I think the crowd-sourced titles are decent and in good faith. I appreciate the number of guidelines the devs put out to even propose a proper title. It sort of feels like Wikipedia - it might have its vandals, but collectively I think it's in good hands. - Rated 5 out of 5by Tyrone, 2 months agoAn extremely solid addon that prevents my brain (I have Inattentive ADHD) from falling for clickbait on instinct and titles videos properly for me to tell what they are (I have OCPD).
- Rated 5 out of 5by David Viveros, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by FoxEnjoyer, 2 months agoGreat extension from a great developer. I paid extra, because I have also been using SponsorBlock for years. Both SponsorBlock and DeArrow are worth every penny.
- Rated 3 out of 5by Anonymous, 2 months agoEdit: I don't mind if the reminder appears every single time, as long as I have to only confirm once (1 button). But, I don't care how many times the 5 confirmations thing appears, if it does, I'll just cancel. It's THAT annoying to me.
While, I do like this extension. I dislike the new change of having to confirm 5 times before I can submit an altered title. This is significantly detract me from even bothering, it's too much hassle. A single confirmation should be enough to get the message across.Developer response
posted 2 months agoThe guidelines reminder does not appear for every submission
It appears the first time you submit, once more a day later, then three days later, then a week later, then once per month.
People have mentioned now knowing the rules thanks to this dialog so it does seem to be working to try to improve the titles being submitted
Edit: If you think it's too much effort to click a few checkmarks once a month, then yea, please don't submit. We do want people putting some level of effort when thinking of new titles - Rated 5 out of 5by RandomAnvil, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Hollytryx, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14740377, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by deanohl2, 2 months ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 17139973, 2 months agojust kinda mid especially since you pay for it.
- Rated 5 out of 5by 3kh0, 2 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by mutie, 2 months agoI think people should be able to vote without clicking into the video. it would make the system more engaging to incentivize participation, and maybe lead to less low quality changes. Unless you are submitting, judging the quality or annoyingness of a title/thumbnail doesnt require watching it.
Developer response
posted 2 months agoA title might look correct until you watch the video and realize the video is actually about something else - Rated 2 out of 5by thib, 3 months agoIt almost exclusively work on channels that do mild and tolerable clickbait, for example Tom Scott
Developer response
posted 3 months agoThis extension is made for creators who upload good videos but with not so good titles and thumbnails. Tom Scott is a good example of that