Reviews for LeechBlock NG
LeechBlock NG by James Anderson
1,736 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18433297, 10 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18433102, 10 months agoI am not one to exaggerate but i am not kidding when I say this is has been the catalyst for changing my life for good, every facet of it. As mandatory and important ublock origin is on every device it has nothing on the importance of Leechblock for good of society
- Rated 5 out of 5by Alabhya Jindal, 10 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18429523, 10 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Paulcrews3, a year agoFucking useful and simple enough for a computer illiterate. Blocked reddit and youtube and immediately felt a weight off my shoulders. No more doom scrolling and wasting my time watching stupid bullshit. Thanks James!
- Rated 5 out of 5by AMJC, a year agoBest program for keeping me on track. Love the options for how to manage my social media so that I can pick and choose how I structure my time. Keep up the good work and I am also making a donation.
- Rated 5 out of 5by goblin, a year agoI don't even use the straight-up blocking function that much, even just the delay function works like a charm to keep a mindful eye on surfing and social media habits. Simple yet customizable and effective, this has got to be one of the add-ons I most often recommend to others
- Rated 5 out of 5by baltagod, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18409152, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18408143, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by petrichorboi, a year agoVery helpful as someone with ADHD! I like being able to allow different amounts of time for different sites/groups of sites.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Yuli, a year agoCould it be possible to specify a local HTML as block page? Thank you!
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18405697, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18405663, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18404719, a year agoWorks just perfectly fine, especially when you are trying to build habits for yourself.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18311296, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Lunakri, a year agoIt's not a silver bullet against procrastination, but it is, like, a regular bullet, and those are pretty useful too
- Rated 5 out of 5by acarimargo, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Sacnam, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Edenly, a year agoMy man James is a lifesaver actually and deserves so much credit, still figuring it all out but BOY has this saved my skin many a work day over these past few years
- Rated 5 out of 5by harley, a year ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Peter, a year agoTime block is not optional.
Screen says 'Enter the time periods within which to block these sites (optional)'.
But leaving it empty makes the plugin to skip everything in the list. So not optional at all.Developer response
posted a year agoIt is optional, because you can enter a time limit instead of time periods. If you don't enter either time periods or a time limit, then, of course, nothing will be blocked. You have to specify one or the other. Otherwise, how would the extension know when you want the sites blocked? - Rated 5 out of 5by Pepper, a year agoExcellent plugin for browser, but has become completely unusuable on mobile. Requires opening the extension and saving options again to get it to start blocking the current tab, which defeats the purpose.
edit: seems this is on Firefox's end, solution is possible by not using filters (I think)Developer response
posted a year agoYeah, unfortunately there are issues with Firefox for Android: https://github.com/proginosko/LeechBlockNG/issues/419
Hoping to see a fix before too long. - Rated 3 out of 5by Gentle, a year agoWe wrote about how this extension makes firefox unresponsive, though it kind of is our fault for having 20 000 tabs open.
The developer responded -immediately- with a fix which we really appreciate and were surprised by. They told us to go to enable a performance setting in the general tab, that only considers active tabs.
However, the fix didn't work. It made firefox a little more responsive, but in that we only had to wait one minute per interaction with the browser instead of three.Developer response
posted a year agoThe other thing you could try is increasing the value of the "Process tabs every __ second(s)" option. With 20,000 tabs open (!) there's going to have to be a trade-off somewhere.