Reviews for NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite by Giorgio Maone
2,317 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14325950, 6 years agoI have been a continuous user for more than 8 years. Initially I needed security support when accessing financial data on the web. More recently I have referred to and taken action from NoScript warnings when visiting a much wider range of sites. NoScript has never let me down!
Thanks must go to Giorgio and his team for his impressive app. Developer response
posted 6 years agoJust FYI: "unlimited storage" permission is needed by NoScript in order to persist your settings, and more specifically your permissions list which may become very large. Anyway, the full source code repository (with all the changes history) is available here: https://github.com/hackademix/noscript
Hope it helps you stop conjuring theories about the intentions of this extensions.- Rated 5 out of 5by digitalcircuit, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by AbdAbd10, 6 years agothank you for your hard work and i have problem with the last version. that some websites cant get load until i disable the add-one ( i stuck in a white screen ). and thank you
Developer response
posted 6 years agoCouldy ou please report with more details here? Thanks! https://noscript.net/forum - Rated 5 out of 5by gZL2mGVQ, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by George Thomas, 6 years agoOne of those "must-have" add-ons. You really need this even if you think you don't
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14114271, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 12950286, 6 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 14298576, 6 years agoFirst off, I've used NoScript for a number of years and have donated and am hovering between 2-3 stars due to the terrible UI.
Unfortunately the UI remains extremely poor, with confusing wording and very bad icon designs (w.r.t usability, nevermind esthetics). The UI uses double negatives, which is bad (ref: MS and Apple). This may be a side effect of Italian translation.
There is not differentiation with colour: blue and red are used in the icons regardless if something is "safe" or "unsafe". The exclamation mark doesn't work that well for conveying meaning (it's "sort of" a warning, but then the "stop sign" is also used - but now the stop sign means, "stop restricting" (again - double negative))
E.g.
S!: disable restrictions (change icon. to, almost anything, change wording to: "Allow everything (including blocked scripts)")
!: disable restrictions for this tab (change icon to almost anything else, change wording to: "Allow everything on this tab. (Maintain restrictions on blocked domains)")
Clock!: Set all to temporarily trusted (change icon, "Temporarily Trust everything on this tab. (Maintain restrictions on blocked domains)" )
Clock + Stop symbol: revoke temporary permissions (change icon, wording to "Normal operation"?) - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14292288, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14250674, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14290478, 6 years agoModule efficace et indispensable avec une interface très intuitive et esthétique depuis Firefox Quantum.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Gumby448, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14287774, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14284504, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14283637, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Jimmy Montano, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by mk_hdh, 6 years ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Vit, 6 years agoI like it but my rules were reset a few times.
p.s. is there a list of privileged pages?Developer response
posted 6 years agoThe "privileged pages" are those which WebExtensions cannot have access to, i.e. a bunch of about:xyz pages, plus the domains listed in this about:config preference:
extensions.webextensions.restrictedDomains
Anyway using this as a discussion forum is not a good idea. Please report your reset issue (and bring other discussions, if any) at https://noscript.net/forum, thank you! - Rated 4 out of 5by Nefae, 6 years ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by MuhoRog, 6 years agoIn the Livejournal when the noscript is enabled, player youtube is not available. It's just not there. His noscript cuts out. Please fix it. This has been happening for a long time. But you can not fix it. When I turn off the noscript, everything becomes correct. Sorry for my English.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Paramdeo Singh, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14275679, 6 years agoUPDATE: It seems, although the Firefox add-ons page was reporting NoScript 10.1.9.4 it may not have been that version causing the issues, although Firefox had been re-started 3 times. Since writing the report (and those 3 re-starts after NoScript updated), the local page issues have now gone. Maybe 10.1.9.4 has to be run more than once for its fixes to the 10.1.9.2 bugs to take effect, and these are only picked up on browser re-start? The incorrect display of < noscript > has gone on the 4th re-start and the NoScript menu now shows a configurable file: domain for the first time since the major upgrade. Thank you for fixing! Changed from 1* to 3* [will be back to 5* if/when fully working].
FURTHER UPDATE: It has been working ok the rest of the day, so looks like the general incompatibility with Firefox 62.0 has also been fixed. Now back to 5* thanks.
ORIGINAL ISSUES [now fixed]:
As others have found, Firefox 62 plus the bad and admitted severe bugs in NoScript 10.1.9.2 have totalled its operation and the only way of using Firefox is to disable NoScript. Where do I start? All issues have been verified by disabling NoScript: without it no issues occur, with it enabled all occur, so it is the sole cause.
First, after a while, as others have reported, Firefox just stops working and will show nothing. From the console, it looks like NoScript has broken the Firefox origin policy on everything. Where is it trying to import scripts from?
The problem, reported on the NoScript forum that pages on local disks are broken since 10.1.9.2 on Firefox 61.0.2 remains. The scripts (used to) run but incorrectly also showed the content of < noscript >. A moderator proved this with a use case but the report has now been deleted. In Firefox 62.0, it is now worse. The page may load once (incorrectly) if you are lucky, then if you reload it stops (previous point). There is no facility in the current UI to specify permission for local pages (I think there was before the big change to the Firefox api)
Somewhere, probably in 10.1.9.2, the user list of allowed and blocked sites has been corrupted. 10.1.9.4 was supposed to fix this and recover the situation but hasn't [on the first or second runs].
As you just seem to delete some issues reported on your forums, please don't ask me to post there. Unless this barrage of severe errors is fixed quickly, the product is now unusable, sorry. I will be sad to have to uninstall it after around 5 years.