Reviews for Web Archives
Web Archives by Armin Sebastian
Review by KirkH420
Rated 4 out of 5
by KirkH420, 3 years agoIt works to some extent, I like it's ability to open all the different web archives with one click.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
308 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by BatsRule, 3 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Sione, 3 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by 退出党团队远离中共邪教, 4 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Maximilian Grothusmann, 5 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15254436, 11 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18866863, 25 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18248595, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by VaRLoK, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by stop5, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by GothGlamPrincess, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by BillKoochooloo, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by bunnie, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18619481, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by 天灭中共退党团队保平安, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18762409, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18799431, 3 months ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Stella, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18121971, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18222669, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18751420, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Puddles, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Daniel Martí, 4 months ago