Reviews for Colorpick Eyedropper
Colorpick Eyedropper by Sam Larison
Review by Esteban Rocha
Rated 2 out of 5
by Esteban Rocha, 6 years agoWell in my opinion I think you should improve your communication skills, that's noway of asking for feedback, nevertheless here is it: The extension is great on chrome superB job, but in Firefox on Dev and Nightly channels there are so many bugs that it's very hard to even use it, eye dropper does not works, most times. Hopefully you can update it at some point as it is way better in my opinion than Colorzilla
Developer response
posted 6 years agoI agree it doesn't always work right - lots of times it depends on what site you are on. So far I have found it doesn't work on sites like this one, or the getting started site, etc. There are lots of features in the extension that simply do not work in firefox right now last I checked, like webgl rendering, so there are a lot of ways to break the extension and many places it doesn't work. Thats why its experimental mode still.
Thanks for the feedback.... one comment though is that instability might be normal thing to expect in the dev channel or nightly build, and instability of this extension in those channels might be unavoidable at times no matter what steps are taken to improve the extension. In spite of that there could be a race condition or something where depending on the speed of the computer and the exact site being visited no feature of the extension will work or it may work inconsistently. I hope this is not the case but it could be one possible thing that could explain some of the instances the extension not working as expected.
There are very similar issues that plague the chrome version from time to time. Sometimes the content scripts just don't run, or fail to be evaluated when we detect they didn't run, etc.
I will at some point try to at least show the right message for "cannot run on this page" when I am sure what set of pages this rule will apply to.... and may try some fallback image when webgl doesn't work.
Thanks for the feedback.... one comment though is that instability might be normal thing to expect in the dev channel or nightly build, and instability of this extension in those channels might be unavoidable at times no matter what steps are taken to improve the extension. In spite of that there could be a race condition or something where depending on the speed of the computer and the exact site being visited no feature of the extension will work or it may work inconsistently. I hope this is not the case but it could be one possible thing that could explain some of the instances the extension not working as expected.
There are very similar issues that plague the chrome version from time to time. Sometimes the content scripts just don't run, or fail to be evaluated when we detect they didn't run, etc.
I will at some point try to at least show the right message for "cannot run on this page" when I am sure what set of pages this rule will apply to.... and may try some fallback image when webgl doesn't work.
41 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17694475, 2 months agoThe ads make it unusable when zoomed into a page. Disappointed in the update, removing immediately.
Developer response
posted 2 months agoTo be fair, the extension "ads" as you say are just images with links, they do not track you... also if you do check the registration screen clicking "steal" or use the console command there steal(); on register.html is a valid option for registration and disabling the in page "ads" with the advanced option. - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13545328, 3 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Arnav, 5 months agoI understand making something yourself and wanting money but to put this many ads in an extension seems egregious considering there are alternatives.
Developer response
posted 2 months agoTo be fair, the extension "ads" as you say are just images with links, they do not track you... also if you do check the registration screen clicking "steal" or use the console command there steal(); on register.html is a valid option for registration and disabling the in page "ads" with the advanced option.
These amazon affiliate links, nor the actual ads on the website (which is not really something to review here, imo), have ever made an appreciable amount, hosting costs more than has ever been acclimated by any means, including registrations.
I wonder how the alternatives stay in business, just saying... because there ARE unethical ways to make money on extensions, but this extension does not do that. - Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 17895538, 6 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by rosewood, 7 months agoI've always loved this extension as a chrome user, so I'm super happy that its available in firefox too. I've used this extension for abt 6 or 7 years now and its been my favorite one out of the several I've used
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14203571, 8 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by whydoineedausername, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Yoshicraft224, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16443641, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by vromahya, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 16413007, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Anthony Graydon, 2 years agoMakes finding hex color code so easy I'm a website designer so this tool comes in very handy. I used it multiple times a day!!
- Rated 1 out of 5by Deniz Kocatepe, 2 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by sofian sea, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by BethNicole, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by rukkiecodes, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by tree, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Fi-Fi, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by artgb, 4 years agoTo me better than CollorZilla as you don't have to restart picker every time you want to pin colour.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Emad, 4 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14959698, 4 years ago