Reviews for FireMonkey
FireMonkey by erosman
Review by IvoryJam
Rated 5 out of 5
by IvoryJam, 4 years agoFantastic, no longer do you have to add Sylish and ViolentMonkey to your browser, then worry about security.
The extension is security aware and transparent, active developer (!!!), and easy to write in.
The extension is security aware and transparent, active developer (!!!), and easy to write in.
74 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Dodge1, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by royalsos, 5 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Lex, 6 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18434741, 7 months agoNothing works properly both user-Scripts and user-Style are broken especially any .css seems to not being respected
Developer response
posted 5 months agoPlease post the details to the support for a proper investigation. - Rated 5 out of 5by tuure, 9 months ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by garrettw87, a year agoI wanted to like FireMonkey, but unfortunately it seems to be incompatible with the vast majority of scripts I use with the Waze Map Editor downloaded from greasyfork.org. There are no JavaScript errors -- the scripts just do nothing. They are listed as active on the page, but something about them just doesn't work with this addon. So I'll have to switch to a different one.
Developer response
posted a year agoPlease post the details to the support for a proper investigation. - Rated 5 out of 5by Brown121, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14571563, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Đăng Tú, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by DavidK2, a year agoThe UI is much better and more intuitive than that of TemperMonkey.
I really like the distinction between CSS and JS modifications and that I don’t need to use “proprietary” GreaseMonkey functions like GM_addStyle (` /* the CSS goes here */ `).
FireMonkey also doesn’t exhibit the bug that TemperMonkey does — when I navigated the same portal over many pages, it seemed TM kept adding the same CSS script over and over, which, over time, slowed Firefox noticeably (after a while TM reported aplying about 70 scripts instead of 2!). - Rated 5 out of 5by ImQP, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Frantishek, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Ben SALT.id, a year ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 12818352, a year agoSeems like we can't import scripts from zip
Right, unzip everything and import works, but slightly inconvenient, thank you for replying.Developer response
posted a year agoUsers can unzip themselves and then mass-import all scripts. Reading zip requires additional library. - Rated 2 out of 5by Freso, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by idealth, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Modenium, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Rayke, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by emacsomancer, 2 years agoIt is indeed super lightweight. A nice advantage to being on Firefox, as it's not available elsewhere.
- Rated 5 out of 5by serotonin_2a, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by tibequadorian, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by MoiceVail, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Ghost, 2 years ago