Reviews for Image Map Editor
Image Map Editor by Heinz-Jürgen Boms
Review by Korwin
9 reviews
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 14919280, a year agoUsed this editor some years ago. This month, I wanted to use it again but it didn't work. Until I found out, that it is essential, that you use ID= for the usemap and not (only) NAME=. Then it work very OK, Thanks Heinz-Jürgen!
- Rated 1 out of 5by Gallienus, 2 years agodoes not work to edit image maps, the menu only is enabled to create a new image map.
image map existing is in html - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17480588, 2 years agoDoes what it says it does and does it very well.
- Rated 5 out of 5by DJoe, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by uniQ.works, 5 years agoI don't know how this Plugin got only 7 reviwes (by now) in the first place - but how can those ratings then differ from "it's okay" to "bad design"?!
Ladys and gentleman, it's for development! It doesn't have to be sprinkled with shiny icons and whatever those people here expected.
Let me tell you: This tool is phenomenal. It saved me ages of time, worked on the first try AND optimized my Imagemap-Workflow by hundreds of percentages.
Of course this tool doesn't create Imagemaps for you :D It helps you debug and edit them. You can't blame the developer of this plugin, if you are too busy for some seconds of description reading.
Don't get me wrong - all the reviews here might have their qualification. But not if there are only like what? 7 reviews at all and 3 of them are "1 star"?
I don't know man, I will show everyone in my circle this plugin, might even name a child after the developer :D
He could have created this plugin for himself and use it for his projects - but he decided to share it, so you lazy boys and girls save a looot of time. Not all heros wear capes :)
This is a well-earned 5 star review!
Love from germany, hamburg!
(Gerade gesehen, dass Sie (Herr Boms) ein Landsmann sind: Ich wünsche Ihnen einen fabelhaften Tag! Danke für das Plugin und erhalten Sie sich Ihre Ideenreichtum!) - Rated 5 out of 5by Yaohan Chen, 5 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 15313832, 5 years agoIncredibly poor design (looks like it was made in 1993). Also very unstable. It worked yesterday but now it refuses to work.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13790891, 7 years ago