Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
Review by Himisuda
Rated 5 out of 5
by Himisuda, 9 days ago1,062 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by sunflwr, 3 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19007227, 3 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by ryandavidson417, 5 days agoI used to very strongly appreciate this extension as a way of letting trans people easily identify transphobes who were actively harmful to our community. Unfortunately it's fallen victim to the all too common trend in our community to segment and divide ourselves rather than working together to keep each other safe.
While I don't mean to diminish the (still very important) conversations regarding inter-community transphobia and failings, it's counterproductive to dismiss and ostracize our own community members. Even if they don't share your opinion on how transphobia applies to one group of trans people vs another, it's important to still stand with them against the people who actively want to eradicate us. Moreover, writing any queer person off as persona non grata is only going to further prevent any productive discussion from actually happening.
Direct discussions about inter-community bigotry are important and healthy. Claiming that trans people are anti-trans for having their own opinion in these discussions is not. I know I'm just some shmuck on the internet and this unlikely to actually get read by anyone doing the mark bombing nonetheless change their mind. But you're actively ruining a valuable tool meant to help us stay safe from the people who hate us. Please reconsider.
And if the Mods of this extension are reading this, consider a new policy for filtering out bad faith reviews, or at least indicating when the label is controversial. I know many trans people who are marked as red, and have been asking for people to refute that rating, but the current system still provides too much weight to whichever side submits more votes, when it should at least indicate the uncertainty. - Rated 5 out of 5by Ash the Yggdrasil, 5 days agoThis is actually a one-star review.
I am transfeminine. The claims of "review bombing" are false. I have seen, with my own eyes, all of the things that the one-star reviews are talking about. Please listen to them and do not use this extension. It is moderated, or at least run, by some very unpleasant people. Please, take a minute to read the one-star reviews to get the full breadth of it.
In short:
THIS IS NO LONGER A TOOL FOR MARKING TRANS-SAFE SPACES.
It used to do that, but the developers have some serious issues with transmascs and intersex people, especially BIPOC queers. They deny that transmascs/trans men experience transphobia in a unique manner (transandrophobia) and silence intersex voices.
Do not get this extension Maybe get it if the devs clean up their act.
Edit: As of May 2025, the devs still haven't fixed anything. - Rated 1 out of 5by Themis, 5 days agoTrans men and intersex individuals airing their grievances about how there is rampant infantilzation of these communities in our queer online spaces is not anti-queer. The word "transandrophobia" being used to describe the horrible treatment the queer community gives to our brothers is not anti-queer.
- Rated 5 out of 5by death2germany, 6 days agothose complaining about it 'incorrectly' marking trans men are simply transmisogynists. going to their blogs on tumblr they're either tmras or cryptoterfs, almost all subscribing to """"transandrophobia"""". this app works as intended, with transfeminists rightfully marked green.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Toby, 6 days agoPinning people as transphobes for talking about intersexism is insane. Same for transmascs being marked unsafe for just talking about their oppression.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Perrio, 6 days agoIt used to be very useful. Now I just keep it as a joke.
It allows people that say super transphobic things to be marked as green. I've seen people who use slurs like "theyfab" "zippertits" etcetera be marked as trans-friendly.
On the flipside, it also marks a lot of trans-masculine people as transphobic for just discussing the ways in which they've been hurt by transphobia. The people I've seen are not transphobic, they're literally speaking against transphobia. It is confusing and I don't understand why they're being marked red.
I've also seen a lot of intersex people and intersex activists be marked as red too, even ones that are trans themselves or are very pro-trans. I'm intersex and this concerns me a lot.
I don't understand why it's like this now. It used to be so much more useful, but now it seems like it's been hacked by transphobes or something.
Huge shame. - Rated 2 out of 5by Skye, 7 days agoTwo stars, as I did use the app for years and found much usage out of it until recently. I appreciate the concept and it did help me filter out transphobic sources, but recently, the extension has been horribly mismanaged and the criteria for marking someone as anti-trans seems to be poorly monitored.
I've also seen explicitly trans-friendly sources get rejected from inclusion in the extension - such as the YouTube channel Two Hot Takes, who have openly voiced their support for transgender people across multiple videos. I have reviewed the criteria for submitting labels multiple times and I have yet to find anything from this channel that would disqualify them from being marked as trans-friendly. This is far from the only example, but one worth bringing up nonetheless.
Updates in recent years do not take into account the needs of the wider trans/nonbinary community. When I first installed this extension around 2018, it was very explicitly inclusive of the wider community, but no longer seems to acknowledge nonbinary and intersex voices. Devs have not properly acknowledged concerns from many users regarding the extension's safety. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18997387, 8 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by raven, 9 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18734000, 9 days agoThis app has been invaluable to me as a transfem for avoiding unsafe people, including terfs, conservative transphobes, and even transmisogynists within the trans community (who happen to be engaging in targeted behavior towards this app). I like that it doesn't discriminate based on identity - if anyone engages in transmisogynist rhetoric, including trans women, they're marked red, as they should be.
- Rated 1 out of 5by TX, 11 days agoShinigami Eyes Is Failing the Community It Was Meant to Protect
Shinigami Eyes is not being “review bombed.” It is being rightfully called out for perpetuating transphobia, intersexism, and internalized community bias. This extension, once a helpful tool for flagging transphobic or unsafe spaces, is now actively contributing to the very harm it was created to prevent.
Let me be clear: I love and support trans women and transfeminine people. My critique is not rooted in misogyny or transmisogyny, but in a commitment to the safety and dignity of all gender-expansive people—including transmascs, nonbinary people (often dismissively labeled as “theyfabs”), intersex individuals, and our allies.
Too many voices in our community are being silenced by this tool. Transmascs, nonbinary people, and intersex folks are being marked red—“unsafe”—not for any transphobic or bigoted behavior, but simply for speaking out about our lived experiences with oppression and systemic sexism. Meanwhile, accounts that promote violence against transmascs and men, deny nonbinary or intersex identities, or spread hate are still being marked green—“safe.”
This isn’t just individual bias. It’s systemic harm. It’s the erasure of marginalized voices within an already marginalized community. And it defeats the entire purpose of Shinigami Eyes.
To the developers and moderators: you must do better. Learn to recognize transmisogyny (sexism against trans women), transmisandry (sexism against trans men), exorsexism (sexism against nonbinary people), and intersexism (sexism against intersex people). These are real, harmful forces in our community. They deserve to be flagged—not shielded.
Trans women are valid. Trans men are valid. Trans nonbinary people are valid. Trans intersex people are valid. If your plug-in claims to protect gender-expansive people, then it must protect all of us.
Until then, I recommend uninstalling Shinigami Eyes—or, at the very least, disregarding the red and green tags and manually correcting false reports. As it currently functions, it no longer serves the community it once aimed to defend. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18992879, 11 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by monster-energy-guzzler-supreme, 11 days agoapparently intersex people fucking existing is dangerous to trans people but terfs are just fine 💀💀💀💀💀
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18975238, 11 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Chaim, 12 days agoThis extension works as intended! Transmascs who post transmisogynistic content and who are angry about being called out are review-bombing.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18991084, 12 days agoTransmisogynistic transmascs rlly hate when you point out they're being transmisogynistic! This extension is working as intended ^_^
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17842059, 14 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18987260, 14 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Lux, 14 days agoDespite being reviewbombed by terfy theyfabs who wants to erase trans women and claiming the opposite, this app is safe. Every Transmen and enbyes flagged red by this addon has done something related to transmisoginy.
- Rated 1 out of 5by TertiaryNemo, 14 days agoI wish I wasn't having to write this review, but the recent trend in this extension's highlights is pretty clear. It's no longer reliable and frequently flags explicitly pro-LGBT sources/sites as red and notably TERF-y sources as green. Terrible loss for anyone who used it in years past.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18987003, 14 days agoUsed to be a great tool, but now it's just used by the people who run it to flag people who disagree with what being trans "should" look like- such as targeting trans men who speak out about their experiences instead of shutting up and suffering in silence.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18986051, 15 days agoI personally think its fine despite the suspicious review bombing lol