Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
Review by Firefox user 17157829
Rated 1 out of 5
by Firefox user 17157829, a month agoThis plugin is no longer useful as it has been weaponized against non-feminine presenting trans people.
1,162 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Ash the Yggdrasil, a day agoHello. I am transfeminine. I ask you read this review before continuing to read any others.
Many of the people rating this as "five stars" claim transmisogyny and "review bombing."
It is not review bombing. Most, if not all, of the one-star reviews are valid concerns and I have witnessed the things the one-star reviews are talking about with my own eyes. The people giving out one star reviews are not being transmisogynist. The fact that my own sisters in the trans community will claim such of people actually having grievances and struggles of their own is a fact that disgusts me.
Most of the one-star reviews are discussing experiencing "transandrophobia," intersexism, and even racism at the hands of the developers of this extension. They speak of many people being completely, unfairly, and unjustly marked red, and I have seen this happening more and more often, and I find more and more people being marked green purely on the basis of being a trans woman.
This is actually a one-star review, but I wanted to put this here to challenge the people in the 5-star section having the disgusting gall to call our trans siblings "transmisogynist" for the mere fact that they are not trans women themselves.
And if one such reviewer is reading this...
Do better. I know you can. Fix your hearts. - Rated 1 out of 5by Lau, 2 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by facelesswaddledee, 2 days agohas been marking intersex and transmasc specific discussions as anti-trans, especially on tumblr, along with marking terfs and intersexophobic blogs as safe. might be useful outside of tumblr but no longer useable.
- Rated 5 out of 5by dimensioncannon, 3 days agothis extension is an excellent flag that signals to me that i need to dig deeper into a person's stances on trans people before sharing their content online. contrary to many of these reviews, the moderation is extremely consistent; it is simply that whoever's doing the moderation is focused on preventing transmisogyny (as they should be). the website itself states, "Don't assume someone is not transphobic just because they are trans or non-binary themselves." every single trans person i've seen marked red on shinigami eyes or complaining about a false flag has indeed had transmisogynistic rhetoric on their blog. this extension isn't wrongfully marking anyone; you simply disagree with the moderator(s) when it comes to what is or isn't transphobic. personally, this extension has helped me block terfs i see in my notifications so that my posts don't gain traction in their circles, which has been massively useful over the years. thank you shinigami eyes!
- Rated 1 out of 5by milemarker, 4 days agois it really a smear campaign if many users, such as myself, were unaware of the wrongfully-marked-red accounts of the past year or so, and are only recently learning that this is a widespread issue that isn't being addressed properly? i now know there's no point in trying to address it, as the extension's owners are in on it.
you there, random user looking for an easier way to avoid transphobes online. were you thinking about using it? don't. it was good once. it no longer is. - Rated 5 out of 5by owie, 4 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by pinedcones, 4 days agoBoth the creator and many users are using this add-on to promote transphobia instead of warn against it. Do not trust. Do not use.
- Rated 1 out of 5by SakuraDaifuku, 4 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Vanessa, 5 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by rose, 7 days agodevs who run the master list of green and red r marking intersex and transmasc ppl as "anti-trans", is discriminatory towards intersex ppl. trans ppl (perisex trans women in this case) r not immune to prejudice and it rlly shows here. dont use this extension, it lost its use once it started discriminating against intersex and transmasc ppl
- Rated 5 out of 5by herrygirl, 7 days agohas its uses, got recommended by this really cool cis dude. it's always a delight to stumble upon a celebrity marked green when i least expect it. no clue what the recent enmity's about, this thang makes the web a little less scary......
- Rated 5 out of 5by Latang, 7 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Samantha, 7 days agoOkay I'm seriously confused but I'm not gonna trust what's being written these don't sound like real people they sound like bots or republicans masquerading as trans or whatever either way I really don't care what a bunch boxes of text are saying until I see it for myself I'm not trusting you
- Rated 1 out of 5by Raven, 8 days agofor some reason a bunch of trans and intersex people are being marked red now for no apparent reason. i think anti-trans people found the extension and are weaponizing it
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19172541, 8 days agoOne star reviewers are mad that their transmisogyny is being highlighted. Would advise you to ignore them if you are a serious person. This is a very useful extension that I refuse to go without in my browser.
- Rated 1 out of 5by idonthack65, 9 days agoFound a lot of pro-trans pages improperly marked as transphobic, especially pages dedicated to transmascs. Apparently upon further research (and viewing numerous, COUNTLESS blogs marked as transphobic just for being SLIGHTLY pro transmascs) this is a very widespread issue. Removing this plugin as it is now completely useless. The only times I saw it be accurate was mark obvious centrist/right wing pages that well, OF COURSE WE KNOW are transphobic like the Guardian. Counterproductive to the internet experience.
- Rated 1 out of 5by IndiGhost77, 9 days agojust reported this app for targeting harassment against transmasc trans activists. to everyone calling the devs out on this, you're welcome. and to the devs: do better.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Tazel, 9 days agoThe five star reviews are full of misinformation. There has been a massive wave of transmasc trans rights activists being marked as unsafe, and no, it's not because they're doing or saying anything transmisogynistic. These are simply people who are speaking out about the struggles trans men face, and/or simply existing as trans men. The only way you could interpret that as not being safe is if you think all trans men are unsafe, which, I'm sorry to say, is an anti-trans viewpoint. It seems the people currently running the database only care about cis women and binary trans women, and either don't care about or actively despise all other identities. As other reviews have noted, intersex people are also being hit particularly hard. It used to be at least usable, and on paper it would be nice to have an extension like this that actualy works, but as the devs have made it, it's doing more harm than good.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Xaephia, 9 days agoMade unusable due to the devs' own active transphobia and unwillingness to moderate their own tool. Mass-"anti-trans"-flagging people who are themselves vocally trans-positive is now common. Used to be a good tool, is now entirely worthless.
- Rated 1 out of 5by pel'tigaan, 10 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Shiiiny, 10 days agoThis extension is NOT SAFE for transmascs or intersex people, especially POC.
- Rated 1 out of 5by CharaDr33murr, 11 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Harley, 12 days agogenuinely good extension that has had a smear campaign against it. primarily by those who would like to pretend that being transgender makes one immune to being transphobic when it's in the extension's guidelines to "not to treat people differently just because of their gender, age or orientation"
these people can fully believe that trans women can be transphobic because "transandrophobia". but cannot fathom that they themselves can platform transphobic ideals.
overall great extension, even if you're not trying to block transandrophobia truthers as it accurately hits radfems pretty well - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17208283, 12 days agoThis used to be really helpful, but it's taken a disappointing turn.