Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
758 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19539583, a month agoUsed to be very helpful but is clearly being used to target people someone doesnt agree with. I say that as a transfem who is hating seeing it used against my trans siblings.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19534951, a month agoin theory useful but the people who currently decide who is and is not "transphobic" for this addon are hateful people who want you to trust their information unquestioningly. there is no way to see why someone is marked red or green, and many outspoken transgender people and activists are marked red for no apparent reason. do not use this extension if you actually want to avoid transphobes
- Rated 1 out of 5by Liskar, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19533346, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Delta_Nyx, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by rem, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Jess, a month agohow is this even allowed is beyond me. the intention is obvious. the premise is dangerous. there was a time where people got marked for their identity... in germany.
- Rated 1 out of 5by robinbird, a month agoThis is an abusive extension that marked my trans activist friend as transphobic and some transphobe i know as GREEN
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14973578, a month agoWhile a good idea in theory, this extension has become completely useless due to a variety of factors leading the information it provides to be unreliable. The main issues are as follows:
- There is no system to view the reason why someone is marked as either pro-trans or anti-trans; the extension instead expects you to trust its opaque data set without question. I'd find it hard to trust any source which makes bold claims regarding a person's bigotry (or lack thereof) without at least one specific example.
- The voting data is processed using an imprecise algorithm known as a "bloom filter" which has a tendency to erroneously categorize people in either the pro-trans or anti-trans category when there aren't actually any votes to support that.
- The anonymous voting is incredibly susceptible to false flags, particularly from exclusionist subgroups within the trans community. This leads to many transmasc, nonbinary and intersex people being marked as anti-trans in retaliation for pushing back against hatred directed towards them, while the people who spread that hate are marked as trans-friendly.
The result of this is a once useful tool becoming a vector for character assassination (whether intentional or not) of vulnerable trans people within our own community. I would not consider recommending this unless all of the above points are meaningfully addressed. - Rated 1 out of 5by PaytheToll, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19503426, 2 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17776307, 2 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by trangener :), 2 months agowhile this works fine on other sites, on social medias it has become completely unusable. violent TERFs are marked green, while intersex activists or transmasculine people are marked red. i've seen people be marked green while saying they wish for the corrective r*pe of trans men or are advocating for the coercive correction of intersex people. absolute insanity. this extension does nothing but to stroke the egos of violent transphobes at this point.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Cerbera, 2 months agoFlags trans and intersex people as red. It clearly has bias against anyone who speaks out against transandrophobia and intersexism.
- Rated 1 out of 5by niko, 2 months agothis extension is openly anti-ftm, anti-intersex, and anti-black. routinely flags actual trans people while transphobes are marked green. also does not tell you why someone is marked red or green.
- Rated 1 out of 5by SudoVL172089, 2 months agoTransphobic devs that exclude intersex/FtM people.
it's also just inaccurate as shit.
Doesn't tell you why somebody was marked red, either. - Rated 1 out of 5by Robin, 2 months agoIt used to be useful, but at this point so many trans folks (including trans feminine people and trans women!) are marked as red these days. The red markers tend to skew toward trans masculine or intersex people, and often crypto-terfs will mark themselves as green. All this does is cause confusion.
Ultimately this needs better moderation, and, preferably, a way to mark individual authors, contributors, and individuals instead of entire news sources or websites. It's kind of jarring to see an article about trans resources marked as red solely because it's on a website that was deemed wholly transphobic, rather than the individual authors of the articles. - Rated 1 out of 5by boxofvoidkittens, 2 months agoDoesn't seem to work? Claims to detect antitrans sentiments, routinely does not do that, flags transgender people as antitrans for speaking about their experiences with transitioning. Is this some kind of fake app/virus?
- Rated 1 out of 5by emeraldo, 2 months agoBefore this review, I'd like to say that I still use this extension, I just manually review people that I see marked as any color before making any judgements on a person.
Lately, this extension has taken a HUGE downfall on the quality of flags- most users I see marked as red are intersex activists or folks that talk about transandrophobia. Whilst I don't have much to talk about either of these matters, what bugs me is that people talking about these matters in positive OR negative light are being falsely flagged as red, despite being trans-friendly in the traditional sense- supporting trans people across the entire spectrum of gender.
I think until a user is being actively transphobic, I.E mis/disgendering people, using transphobic slurs as derogatory slurs, or sharing misinformation about trans people and their experiences, they shouldn't be marked as red. Disagree all you want on what terms are real and fake, but don't let it cloud your sense of judgement- they're still an ally to transgenderism, however that may be. - Rated 1 out of 5by Soup, 2 months agoYou can personally tag and change the red/green markers, but the ones shown to the public are manually reviewed by people with a bias towards transmedicalism. On non-socialmedia sites, it is useful. Everywhere else, it is not.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Anna, 2 months agoToo many people are getting false-flagged--it's now more an extension for transphobes to smear trans people with than actually warning you about transphobes.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Pyro, 2 months agoDon't install Shinigami Eyes. Its accuracy is EXTREMELY low, and it oftentimes mistakes actual transgender people for transphobes and vice versa. This is not a reliable application in its implementation, and it seems to frequently mismark transgender individuals who do not identify with a binary gender in a traditional way (ex. people who don't fit into categories such as stereotypical boys who like blue and girls who like pink). I do not know if that is by design, but it would not surprise me if it was so.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Yugi, 2 months agoI've noticed over the past few months that several very innocuous intersex and nonbinary accounts on Tumblr have been marked as transphobic. I was not able to find anything to back this up in my own searching. I did, however, see a sharp increase in people reporting false tags over the same period of time I've noticed them.
I will be removing this extension until the developers are able to correct this wash of inaccurate, false flagging. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17016267, 3 months agoI used to use it because it was good at pointing out transphobes. Now, it's useless. All I see is trans people marked as red, and actual transphobes unmarked or marked green. The team in charge of it is unreliable.