Reviews for TinEye Reverse Image Search
TinEye Reverse Image Search by TinEye
281 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by omarakavinnie, 7 years ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13914336, 7 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13904329, 7 years agoThis is the only image search that actually works!!!
- Rated 4 out of 5by Tomaž, 7 years agoThere is a new sheriff in town: https://addons.mozilla.org/sl/firefox/addon/search_by_image/.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13796314, 7 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Damrongrit Klangthanu, 7 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 12532989, 7 years agoHelpful info.. (I've been here before because of nonworking TFSC) and my old eyes need help, like a lot of peeps showing up here :)
First, I only use PC Waterfox 64bit 54ver. and I use Thunderbird 32bit 52ver. I have ALL my addon's turned off and not to update including WF and TB. I realize now, That Firefox and Thunderbird will never add some helpful font adjustments for our bad eyes :(
So,...
If you read through the reviews. You'll see some info reviews on how to download and install a non expiring version of TFSC on earlier version of FF, Waterfox, TB. I only wanted to help people because I feel their pain on not being able to see and need help and remember to turn off all updates that includes FF, TB, WF. . I still want to give props to the Author of TFSC. Thx you! - Rated 1 out of 5by AnotherPersona, 7 years agoTinEye has pretty much always been junk. Google, Yandex, and Bing are a million times better. Tin can't find the picture lying on the floor in front of it.
- Rated 1 out of 5by David , 7 years agoUsed to work but now finds ZERO results. I even tested images that I've uploaded to several sites and it did not find a single one of them. So decided to try Google search. It doesn't work either! What is going on with these reverse image search engines?
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13501221, 7 years agoThis extension is just useless. I've got "0 results" for any image I tested.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Leviathan Cerebrate, 7 years agoPensé que usaba el motor de búsqueda de Google, pero al parecer usa el suyo propio. Eso está bien, pero no es lo que yo quiero.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Zvezdochet13, 7 years agoWell, where is the development of this extension? Will he update it or not? Without this extension it is very inconvenient in a new browser
- Rated 5 out of 5by nicod_, 7 years agoExcellente extension et service, je les utilise depuis longtemps pour trouver des sources alternatives, ou vérifier l'utilisation qui est faite d'une photo.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Nicholas Neal, 7 years agoAs much as I like the idea of the extension, I find it very suspicious that they failed to properly mention some of the most important information about their privacy, namely "When you use our services, we may automatically log certain information about your use of the services. This information may include how you use the service, your IP address, your search query, the date and time of your query and referrer URL.". A simple line of text here would've made it look more authentic, yet I had to visit their website and go through a few web pages to access this information.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Great King, 7 years agoThis makes my work so much faster... I do a lot of searches a day! Fantastic, Thanks a bunch.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13280747, 7 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by nbakken81, 7 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by nbakken81, 7 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Bilgerat984, 7 years agoI did a reverse lookup with TinEye on a suspected Craigslist scammer. The reason I did the lookup is an image on an ad only hours old showed up on Google on another web site, while looking up the specs on that particular boat. TinEye failed to find the Google image from the Craigslist image. I then tried the reverse & TinEye also failed to find the Craigslist image from the Google image.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13063215, 7 years ago