Reviews for Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context by Wikiwand
125 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Agent Retard (CIA Employee), 7 months agoThis extension used to be good, not anymore. Aint paying a single penny. AI horsesht garbage
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14338612, 7 months agoThis takes the collaborative spirit of Wikipedia and warps it into a mess filled with ads and shady connections. (At least) one of the developers has intellectually, materially and technologically benefited a discriminatory settler-colonial regime, which adds a disturbing layer to the whole project. This is the perfect example of 'entrepreneurs' taking someone else's hard work and making money off of it, all the while violating the spirit of the creation. Thanks but no, thanks. I'll stick to the boring old 'outdated' version of the site that the community has been diligently working on for ages instead of this AI filled garbage :)
Edit: forgot to add - check out how many servers worldwide this thing is shaking hands with in the background while you're reading your article on Nabataea or the Achaemenids. You might be terribly surprised.
Edit 2: From the horse's own mouth
We also collect information when you make use of the Site, including your browsing history. [...]
By analyzing all information we receive, we may compile statistical information across a variety of users (“Statistical Information”). Statistical Information helps understand trends and customer needs so that new services can be considered and so the Site and associated services can be tailored to customer desires. We may share Statistical Information with our partners, pursuant to commercial terms that we determine in our sole discretion. - Rated 1 out of 5by DeAndre Queary, 7 months agoUsed this forever. But now the AI crap is annoying. Wikipedia has a nice looking site now. I don't need this bloat anymore. Also, don't pay for this mess. Give your money to Wikipedia directly.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18570609, 7 months agoThe new layout is not needed and the AI features are absolutely useless and not needed. Wikiwand should be a wikipedia rebrand, not adding its own "features" that nobody asked for
- Rated 1 out of 5by Davide, 7 months agoplease revert to the last version, this update made UI/UX worse.
- Rated 1 out of 5by kimiz, 7 months agoHorrible user interface change. The developers added a paywall that on top of restricting access to AI features (i.e. summaries, which used to be free), it also now blocks customization through themes and fonts. Moreover, this terrible update made me learn that this product is sharing user data with 'partners'. Uninstalled.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Cliesens, 7 months agoThe addon was great until the new update which changed the layout significantly, for the worse.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17545258, 7 months agoI installed this for the redesign, not for the AI features I do not care about. And now I have to stare at it, even if it's closed.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Sophon96, 7 months agoWikiwand recently pushed its new "omni" version to main, and it sucks.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Fjell, 7 months agoThe newest update is completely and utter shit, it has taken everything that made wikiwand good and gotten rid of it. It has now paywalled swapping fonts and redesigned the entire site without the possibility of reverting..
- Rated 1 out of 5by embyveddii, 7 months agoThe recent updates made this tool god awful, probably so you'll pay them money through subscription. All wikiwand is, is wikipedia but a bit prettier. There's no reason to force this onto us.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Axolotl, 7 months agoUsed to be great but now it's stuffed full with all this terrible AI nonsense that provides unrelaible information and lies to you.
Recently updated their entire layout to focus even more heavily on premium AI content and hide more Wiki information. Terrible terrible terrible. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17276406, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 10745620, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by phat_sumo, a year agoWikiwand's styling is great, but I wish they were more transparent about the data they collect from users. Additionally, ctrl+click constantly breaks and opens links in the same tab, which is infuriating. I wish that basic functionality like this worked consistently.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Pilar Rodriguez Aranda, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by TyrellTheChaotic, 2 years agoJust absolutely broken. I could no longer use Wikipedia because after a few lines the page would 404.
- Rated 1 out of 5by AMC, 2 years agoI used it for a long time and in the last few months has completely broken, leaving me unable to load Wikipedia at all without disabling it.
They started pushing "AI" based crap into it at the same time.
The structural choices they made with the new layout broke other tools ability to summarize and excerpt articles as well.
After month of breakages and AI marketing ads BS I gave up and moved to Modern for Wikipedia. I would recommend you do the same. - Rated 1 out of 5by EllieM, 2 years agoSevere dislexea an I had to uninstal as extension got bad. serif fonts is hard to read so i use wikiwand for years to make it easy for reading wikipeda pages. but on new version it always dos serif titles but no problem coulld still go back an use old layout with easy fonts. i email them to say serif problem got no reply. left reviews for extensions got no reply. now they just remove option to go back to layout 1. so now i can only use the other wikpedia extension that is better than this because they just made this really bad for dislexia people and im sad.