Reviews for Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context by Wikiwand
617 reviews
- Rated 4 out of 5by kind0fmagic, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14900668, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Ivan, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by anothertemple, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Matyi, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Harsha, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by OlavWolfiken, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Pilar Rodriguez Aranda, a year ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by syrthio, a year agoit's... pretty to look at and read, but that's about it. I was excited to find this, but grew increasingly disappointed. most articles I personally read do not have images large enough attached to the article to not get extremely distorted by the otherwise-nice-looking banner Wikiwand generates, and customization is pretty basic (and no longer matches the screenshots here, unless I'm missing something). I was also not pleased with yet more shoving of AI down my throat. it took three or four times switching it off before it stopped popping up. the deal-breaker for me, though, is the loss of the hover preview for Wikilinks -- apparently, they're supposed to work, but never did for me and I get distracted enough as-is without having to open an entirely new page/tab just to see what the article is about. ultimately, user styles for vanilla Wikipedia serve my needs better.
- Rated 5 out of 5by oThi, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by adriaslb, a year ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by pulsar14, a year agoVery good Layout but ... audio reading should be fixed. 1st the reading velocity is not the one set in windows speech; 2nd, the voice type always reset to the 1st available in the list. E.g. If I choose Susan as my preferred ENG voice, why do I have to re-set Susan voice every time I want to listen instead of David (the 1st in the voices list)? 3rd, the reading voice should start from the top row visible on the screen, not at start of the entire doc.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16066501, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Perseus Smith, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Luracasmus, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Alexander Mosquera, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Shalom, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Anthony-S6, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by TyrellTheChaotic, a year agoJust absolutely broken. I could no longer use Wikipedia because after a few lines the page would 404.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15552492, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by i18n, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by EchoBreez, a year ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 12148057, a year ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Martijn, a year agoGreat idea, but execution is poor. Has too many issues, distractions (install on firefox banner when you've got it installed...) and weird features. Like how it doesn't play nice with Dark Reader and the useless but very prominent AI summary. For the last couple of weeks every article only has an intro and an "Oops something went wrong: 404" error so I finally switched to Modern for Wikipedia.