Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized 的评价
Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized 作者: Wikiwand
155 条评价
- So, I wrote a negative review yesterday (which I've now deleted), but it appears that the Wikiwand add-on was updated yesterday and it's now working again. Yay! The AI Tools block on the right can be minimised and an ad blocker takes care of ads, but I may just upgrade to a paid version anyway since I use Wikipedia a lot and WIkiwand (pro) is very reasonably priced and supports the existing and ongoing development efforts of a great add-on. FWIW, I think it's worth it to get a much better reading experience than ordinary Wikipedia for frequent users.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Richard Yan, 1 年前Used to be great with beautiful styles. When the AI stuff rolled out, I felt like it was bad taste but stuck with it. Then came the ads, on top of hard work by volunteers editing wikipedia. I guess we do live in a capitalist society with insatiable corporate greed, but the least I could do is to stop using this expired plugin. Oh and also, no, some lines of CSS is not worth $5 a month.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 linuxenjoyer, 1 年前It was good for a while but they added AI stuff nobody asked for and you now have to be logged into their system for data collection if you don't want to get served ads.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18744013, 1 年前I've used this extension for quite some time and it used to work flawlessly. As of recent updates Wikiwand started to inject advertisements into Wikipedia pages even though Wikipedia, by principles, is free from ads. It's absolutely unacceptable.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18743018, 1 年前Started as a fantastic skin/custom CSS for wikipedia. Now turned into some sort of weird corporate product pushing AI summaries and an ungodly amount of ads! Ads on wikipedia??? Have you gone insane?
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18725086, 1 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Parakeet709, 2 年前Switched to another extension after all these AI features rolled out. Just wanted to change the look of articles, but now I can't even do that because its bundled with the paid AI features. If you're looking for a modern and sleek way to make Wikipedia look nice, either get Dark Reader, which lets you keep the default design but make it dark mode, or Modern for Wikipedia, which makes it look nicer, lets you change between shades from white to black and a light brown, and lastly lets you adjust stuff with the text.
I was not sponsored to say this, by the way, this is just my own opinion. I love the style of Wikiwand, but the AI features being forced on causing other design features to be behind a paywall caused me to list alternatives for people reading this. - 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18666384, 2 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18655778, 2 年前Used to be good, now just full of premium pop-ups, AI, and selling user data.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13885454, 2 年前Bring back the Pre-AI version... New version is garbage... Have opted for a different extension
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Pierson Moore, 2 年前This extension has become unusable. I don't want to sign in to save my formatting settings, it takes 4 clicks to get rid of the stupid popup and then you also have to clear the AI popup. I really don't care if Wikiwand has AI in it or not but stop shoving it down our throats. set it off to the corner of the page and don't open the AI chat/summary until the user requests it.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18641858, 2 年前I loved Wikiwand for years but the AI stuff is just too much. I don't want AI to dumb down a Wikipedia article for me, I can read just fine thanks! The rest of your features are not worth the headache of popups begging me to use AI so I'll pay for more functionality. Uninstalling!
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15046301, 2 年前Were the new AI features worth losing thousands of users? Your job is to pretty up wikipedia, not nagging me every time to login and use AI features. Bye bye.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18625533, 2 年前Used to be lightweight and unobtrusive. Bloated with unnecessary AI features now.