Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
764 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Meow, a year agoHi, I'm transfemme. "Theyfab" is an anti-trans slur and we should not play into patriarchal transmisia by not treating it as such. I'll change my review if you fix this. I'm friends with many people affected by this slur and it's silly and divisive to not treat it as such. Trans people don't all hate each other because we came from different backgrounds and have different genders- that's just overemphasized internet drama, not real life. I gave all my old masculine clothes to a friend affected by this slur, and I don't feel comfortable not treating it as a slur. A word that bioessentializes someone's AGAB as their gender is absolutely the definition of transphobia and constitutes a slur. This is like basic transfeminism 101.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Crunk, a year agomade a guide to say its okay to use a slur that misgenders enby people, good job everyone /s
- Rated 1 out of 5by Hee-Ho-Kun, a year agoThe moderators have begun marking trans people as transphobic for specific stances on intra-community issues; this extension is now useless because of that.
- Rated 1 out of 5by KozaBerserker, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by parallax77, a year agounreliable these days since a lot of people are getting marked red despite being very trans-positive or even previously marked green, and a lot of random people suddenly turning green despite not meeting any requirements. moderation should step up imo.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17022614, a year agoat one point it seemed decently reliable, but i just saw the entire wikipedia dot org article for okra - yes the plant/food - flagged as transphobic so i uhhh. i have very VERY serious doubts about how well moderated (if at all) the submissions are anymore
- Rated 1 out of 5by ol, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by crgzero, 2 years agoNot accurate and relies on feelings instead of facts, what one person thinks is fine another will freak out over. Reviews can't be fact based on something that doesn't rely on facts.
- Rated 1 out of 5by AJ167, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by anettka, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Scoobysnak, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 15176908, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by KaptainCnucklz, 2 years agoUnless they implement a feature to see what post/reasoning was used to justify the red label, and importantly with sources, then this is only going to be a hindrance to have installed if you want to find non-bigoted people. It's wrong worryingly often.
Unless you talk exclusively about issues relevant to transfemmes, then you're marked as transphobic. They're also way too quick to flag transfemmes as green just for simply being trans, often transmedicalists (aka people who think you're only "allowed" to be called trans if you get full gender affirming care, with all the gender affirming surgeries + HRT) will slip through and be green.
Likely that the people controlling it have serious biases against transmasc and enby people. That or the extension is entirely unmoderated, and has become compromised by automation/people doing false marks. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18066063, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by MirioMan, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by herr, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by bleh, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18026876, 2 years agoit is hardly ever accurate and mainly boils down to things the creators just disagree with
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17366374, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17863225, 3 years agoI still use it because it's the only option out there. Maybe one day it will get better and I'll change my rating back to 5 stars that it used to deserve
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17823267, 3 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by SpoopySoup, 3 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Bong13, 3 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Virtuality, 3 years ago