Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
892 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Battlenuts, 9 days agoWrongly marks trans friendly, intersex people, POC struggles, etc etc, or any person the moderators disagree with as red. It's a shame such a useful extension has been corrupted by hate, in times when we should all be standing together. Shame on mods.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Anomaly, 9 days agoI've seen a lot of discussion about this extension online recently, so I wanted to make a review giving my thoughts on this.
As other reviews have stated, the creator is liable to flagging intersex advocates and people who are anti-transmed as transphobic. There have also been incidents in the past where transphobes have worked together to create false flags.
At its core there is an issue with tools that either label people as good or bad with zero context. You don't know if someone who's transphobic on a tool like Shinigami eyes -or even blocklists for that matter - is on there for harassing trans people, is on there because of an intra-community disagreement, or a blacklist creator or submitter personally decided to put them on there for an unrelated reasons. These types of tools can be used to isolate people from their community and smear names.
I truly do understand why people flock to a tool like Shinigami Eyes. We are a group of people that are burnt out of being in danger and having to deal with harassment and want a way that we can easily know who to avoid. It sounds great in theory, but in practice, these types of issues are always liable to happen whether it's with Shinigami Eyes, a curated blacklist, or the callout of the week.
The best you can really do is curate your online space. Check people's posts yourself before you follow them, quietly block whenever you see something you want to avoid, and don't over rely on face-paced social media. - Rated 1 out of 5by aeiou, 9 days agoKeeps marking random Tumblr users as transphobic because the creator disagrees with them.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Kat, 9 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by aerion, 9 days agoThey're in desperate need of new moderators who won't abuse the power to push their own agendas outside of the stated scope.
- Rated 1 out of 5by kreetz, 9 days agouseless, as people speaking up about transmasc, nonbinary, intersex, poc issues get wrongfully marked as red, and those who actively are transmedicalist, radfem are flagged as green. yikes
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18734415, 9 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by jarlic, 9 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 15961385, 9 days agosadly useless now as there have been numerous incorrect/inconsistent markings, including TERFs behind marked green and wikipedia articles for things like plants being marked red.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18734080, 9 days agoWas great until intersex transphobia from the moderators
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 18734050, 9 days agoLately it's been kind of inconsistent on the sources marked red ACTUALLY being in some way actively transphobic when it's on social/public platforms. Sometimes when I follow up on a marking it's accurate, and other times it's not at all. If certain sources simply went uncategorized that would make sense, but there have been multiple trans people marked red but confirmably not supporting any notable transphobic rhetoric (eg.transmed, transradfem).
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18733987, 9 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Windy, 9 days agoThe fact that its guidelines say that bigotry against asexual and aromantic people doesn't count as "anti-LGBT" should have been the first clue that this extension and its devs would start excluding other people too. Now it's marking intersex people and trans men with red just for speaking about their experiences. Skip this extension and do your own research.
- Rated 1 out of 5by the snooterrr, 9 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18733750, 9 days agoFrequently misused for admins' own bigoted views. Useless.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Zira, 9 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Savannah, 9 days agoabsolutely heartbreaking that this extension is no longer the useful tool it was to keep my and my friends safe on the internet. the developers should be ashamed of themselves to falling into racist, intersexist, enbyphobic, and transmasculine-phobic ways of thinking. our community should be working together-- ESPECIALLY in times like these-- not tearing each other down just because YOU don't care to understand someone else's lived experiences. I truly hope the developers can get their heads on straight again, but unfortunately you've lost the trust of a lot of people; myself included.
i don't think I can put into words how frustrated and disappointed I am by this. - Rated 1 out of 5by enfysiridescent, 9 days agoDon't trust Shinigami Eyes. This extension is incredibly inaccurate, and it's only getting worse. Everyone is marked manually by users, and there are many false reports. People who are explicitly trans friendly (including people whose ENTIRE ACCOUNTS are dedicated to trans activism) are getting marked as "anti-trans," while well known transphobes (including people like Ben Shapiro) are getting marked as "trans friendly."
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17552232, 9 days agoused to be fairly useful. but a lot of people keep getting reported for no reason and being labeled incorrectly. The creators are biased against certain groups (basically anyone who says there's issues in trans spaces and want to improve it, including: poc, intersex, and transmasc individuals or people who support them).
Basically not trustworthy unless you personally check everytime on your own. - Rated 1 out of 5by verbalkeysmash, 9 days agoi've been using this extension for years to keep myself safe online as a transgender person, but lately i can't trust its labels on users to be accurate.
there have been SEVERAL times now i've seen trans intersex folks & trans men who talk candidly about the transphobia and cissexism they face labelled red, while people who are openly hostile against them & nonbinary people in particular still keep their green label.
it's disheartening to have to review labelled accounts and their posts for myself to determine whether or not they're actually transphobic or trans safe, especially since it defeats the purpose of using an extension like this to begin with- that being, to know at a glance whether to block a user or to trust that they'd advocate for me without risking exposing myself to transphobia
needless to say, the current state of this extension is a far cry from how it was when i first started using it years ago, and my social media experience is worse for it. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18733585, 9 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Grain1, 10 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by frh, 10 days agoalways suspicious of subscribing to blocklist type additions where you are at the whim of the developers but seeing how the anti trans label is weaponized against trans people the organizer doesn't like is a no go.