Reviews for Container proxy
Container proxy by Aleksei Bekh-Ivanov
73 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by BinaryWorm, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14041545, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by riv1329, 2 years ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Vikarti Anatra, 2 years agoAppears to work in situations where embedded Multi-Account containers proxy support doesn't work (local http proxy to access special network). Tries to test http proxy but says it can't do so.
Developer response
posted 2 years agoSadly HTTP proxy requires a bit of setup to test it and I didn't implement it. - Rated 5 out of 5by AlBee, 2 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Snowman, 3 years agoIt works most of the time, but sometimes it doesn't connect to the internet while my tabs that are outside the container can connect to the internet swiftly. Once that happens, the container will not work again even when I restart my browser or my computer. The only option I'm left with is to uninstall the proxy container and the multi account container, restart my computer and reinstall it. It usually works after this, but sometimes I have to do this twice before it works. I use the latest version of firefox.
- Rated 4 out of 5by fdterr, 3 years agoBrilliant extension in every way, I just wish it worked with Firefox sync
- Rated 5 out of 5by oooaoaa, 3 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by wvxwxvw, 3 years agoА чего он системные настройки не позволяет использовать и, например, прописанные в Firefox автонастройки (proxi.pac)? Недоделан.
Ответ на ваш комментарий:
Зачем бы я стал включать для всего Fx автонастройку, если мне нужно включить ее только для отдельно взятого контейнера. Для другого - системные, для третьего - без прокси, для четвертого - ручные настройки. Надеюсь так понятно?
И "системные настройки" это не "без прокси", системные - это настройки заданные в IE (как минимум для Windows 7-8.1).Developer response
posted 3 years agoНе уверен что точно понял о чём речь.
Системные настройки (т.е. настройки Firefox) будут использоваться если в расширении не выбрано прокси (т.е. выбрано "Напрямую"). - Rated 5 out of 5by Serhiy Serdyuk, 3 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 15402731, 3 years agonice and useful, but it has just one big problem: if I do not use the browser for a while, when I go back to browsing, it breaks web connectivity and I have to disable it to go back to browsing.
Until that, I can't load any page and the browser seems blocked. - Rated 5 out of 5by Hexillium, 3 years agoDoes exactly what it claims to - couldn't ask for more. Very useful for having specifc websites that need an extra layer of anonymisation in the same browser as the rest of your normal browsing
- Rated 5 out of 5by axiata, 3 years agoit's brilliant....it works... please add export import list and dark theme.
Developer response
posted 3 years agoFinally managed to add the dark theme in version 0.18.0. Please, check it out.
Feedback is more than welcome ;) - Rated 5 out of 5by Zulhilmi Ramli, 4 years agoDoes what it should do. Thats fantastic. However I noticed performance wise this addon establish connection slower than FoxyProxy.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Alex5000, 4 years agoSo, it's a pretty fantastic addon idea and I love it. There is one pretty big oversight though. When in private browsing, there is no way to set it to default to a proxy. So private browsing always uses a direct connection. I can't code personally so I can't contribute but it would be great if that issue could be corrected.
- Rated 5 out of 5by James, 4 years agoAmazing extension, allows me to assign proxies per container for different services only available in certain regions. Thank you so much!
- Rated 5 out of 5by Fnin, 4 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Alexey Murz Korepov, 4 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by tmcrnnr, 4 years agoI wish this plugin came a better documentation, but overall its really easy to setup: type in your search bar "about:config#containers" and start customizing.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Chen Xizhan, 4 years agovery usefull extension.
After I enable this plug-in, the browser always automatically switches HTTP to HTTPS. It is indeed necessary to access HTTP URLs during intranet development. Can you improve it?
Sorry I made a mistake, I am accessing the local URL in the container with the proxy enabled. When I switch to the directly connected container, there is no problem.