Reviews for Image Downloader
Image Downloader by Karl
8 reviews
- Rated 3 out of 5by MINI4YU, 3 months agoITS DONT HAVE OPTION TO DAWLOAD AS A PICTURES BUT ONLY IN A ZIP FILE WHO CONTAIN PICTURES, THE FILTER DONT WORKING
- Rated 3 out of 5by Korwin, 3 years agoС Behance справляется. Хотя, для скачивания изображения приходится выполнить восемь (!) нажатий вместо желаемых трех. Немного быстрее, чем просмотр списка изображений текущей веб-страницы в свойствах браузера. Непонятно, почему в галерее есть только "Copy link" и "Open in new tab" но не "Download"? Фоновые изображения с вики на fandom.com не видит.
- Rated 3 out of 5by Azerty, 3 years agoPositive:
When the addon works properly then it's easy to use, and has enough filter options for my uses.
I do however wish there was an option to store the images in the same order as they show up at the filter screen, and not in the filenames' alphabetical order. Or maybe a "file rename" option or something.
Negative:
Unfortunately the current version (at the time of writing) does not always download all the images on a site. I'm guessing maybe it's an issue with two images with the same filename, or something. Whatever the reason you need to check that the created zip file has the same number of files as you chose on the selection screen.
And depending on how a site shows the images (I'm guessing loaded dynamically or something) then this addon doesn't always detect the images, even with an increased search depth. - Rated 3 out of 5by Karl, 5 years agoSuper extension.
But, the bug-reporting form does not work. I wanted to submit a bug regarding instagram, and I couldn't - Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 15318969, 5 years agoKinda sorta does the job, but often doesn't at all. Instead of simply pulling images from browser cache, it perform some sort of a crawl that pulls irrelevant images more often than not. It is also QUITE DANGEROUS. I almost got banned from one website and got completely blocked from another for using it, as this activity triggered some security measures. I've been using "Image Downloader" for Chrome for years without any issues and I though this would be a good replacement. Sadly, it isn't.
Bottom line: kinda works most of the time, very dangerous to use on some websites. - Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 15126249, 5 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 13995371, 6 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by steven, 6 years ago