Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
1,389 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19662642, a month agogot marked red as a trans woman for asking someone to provide a source regarding interpersonal drama in my city. literally can't make this shit up. used to only mark transphobes, now they mark trans people (and especially masculine trans people) red for petty bullshit. i've been active and vocal for trans rights my entire life. what a joke
- Rated 5 out of 5by hexhive, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19890855, a month agoI am transfem, and despite this I was marked red by an ex-mutual for petty interpersonal drama, and have been unable to reverse this. I have also seen so many others have similar experiences. I personally believe going into an account or link with your own judgment and eyes is a more consistent and wise thing to do to make your space online feel safest for you.
- Rated 4 out of 5by witty, a month agoThe one star reviews are (mostly) because transmisogynists are upset they got marked red for their transmisogyny, and can be ignored. In most cases, the extension functions as intended. Particularly so for people marked red, being marked green is a little more iffy.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Moon, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18576472, a month agoLargely overrun by weird tumblr trans women who hate anyone AFAB these days. Considering how just being transmasc or thinking pedophilia is bad will get you flagged red.
- Rated 1 out of 5by lucyisbored, a month agoImmensely racist and transandrophobic. Also loves to defend pedos, for some reason.
- Rated 1 out of 5by paradoxkin, a month agoI am a gender nonconforming trans individual who is outspoken about my support for queer rights, but I found myself marked red on shinigami eyes after someone I got into a petty online disagreement with had all of their friends to mark me as unsafe. This is an issue I've seen repeat over the last multiple years, and it's only gotten worse with time. This used to be a really useful extension, but it's been warped and weaponized against the very community that built it. I can't say I recommend it anymore because it does not accurately identify transphobia/queerphobia as it used to.
- Rated 1 out of 5by felis, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by sharkbaitcrochet, 2 months agoGenuinely does not serve its intended purpose anymore. People that make threats against trans men and transmascs are marked green but anyone who speaks out against anti transmasculinity, exorsexism, or intersexism is marked red. Trans men and transmascs speaking about their experiences and putting a name to that experience isn't a threat to trans women or transfems.
- Rated 1 out of 5by spiinniing, 2 months agoUsed to be useful. Infiltrated by TERFs, overrun with racism, exorsexism, and lateral transphobia. Cannot speak for other social media sites as I don't use them, but it's useless on tumblr. It used to be if I saw a red name and checked, nearly 100% of the time it was a TERF/radfem or otherwise transphobe. Now, if I see a red name, nearly 100% of the time it's just a trans masculine person or an intersex person. It seems like he/him in bio is enough to get you marked red on this extension now lmfao. Would not recommend, hope an alternative that seeks to protect ALL trans people is created.
- Rated 1 out of 5by confusedbug, 2 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Abotoggar, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by sara, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17289853, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by gigi, 2 months agothis add-on is actually rlly reliable if you fully comprehend *why* the people who are marked red/green are marked red/green. it's not about whether or not you're "nice" or are "normal," it's about whether or not you're safe for trans people to be around; specifically, *transfeminine* people, as they are the most vulnerable members of the trans community, and anyone who isn't safe for them shouldn't be considered "trans friendly." that's really all there is to it. useful extension!!! although i agree with people who say it would be nice to know why certain people were marked red/green, the context would be useful too
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19830850, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19829880, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by oMorri, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Lavender, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Heather, 2 months ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Talon, 2 months agouseful for news websites or social media users, completely useless for tumblr. normal people are often marked red while extremely aggressive people are sometimes marked green. discourse stances shouldnt be a measure on minority discrimination.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17727821, 2 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by mystieneko, 2 months agolots of false flags, intersex people and trans men are almost always marked red while transmisandrists are marked green