Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
1,162 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by TerraKnight, 2 months agothis extension is biased against transmascs, and is now basically useless for telling who's for and against trans people. as a transfem, your support of trans people is useless if it does not include transmascs
- Rated 5 out of 5by A.M, 2 months agoYou know the app is working as intended (for trans women to signal who is dangerous or not) because the people saying it doesn't work, all sound like MRAs
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17676743, 2 months agoI've used Shinigami Eyes for years and really have liked it, but there's been an increasing issue with false flags. Plenty of trans friendly people are flagged for seemingly no reason? I've seen many people flagged as anti trans for talking about butterflies (but-terf-lies). I've also seen plenty of people who have been extensively transphobic get pardoned from reports. It doesn't help that there's seemingly no way to provide evidence when reporting so if someone sufficiently posts about something else before getting reviewed, they're can avoid being marked. I'm not sure how this moderation process is working anymore.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18844343, 2 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by mh, 2 months agoThis extension used to be really useful. Now, it's marking a lot of queer, trans, and intersex people red just because they disagreed with the creators about stuff like "can intersex people be trans" and "do transmen face oppression" and "is it okay to misgender non-binary people and call them slurs when they annoy you".
- Rated 5 out of 5by Nikolai, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19012944, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by modeus, 2 months agopeople r review bombing this extension for marking transmysogists as bad
- sincerely a trans women who has to deal with this sh#t - Rated 5 out of 5by sunflwr, 2 months agoExcellent for helping you spot transphobes and transmisogynists and not have to waste your energy with them. I appreciate the simplicity of the extension.
Those complaining about it "incorrectly" marking people as transphobic must reflect upon their words and actions towards their fellow trans people, particularly towards trans women. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19007227, 2 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by ryandavidson417, 2 months agoI used to very strongly appreciate this extension as a way of letting trans people easily identify transphobes who were actively harmful to our community. Unfortunately it's fallen victim to the all too common trend in our community to segment and divide ourselves rather than working together to keep each other safe.
While I don't mean to diminish the (still very important) conversations regarding inter-community transphobia and failings, it's counterproductive to dismiss and ostracize our own community members. Even if they don't share your opinion on how transphobia applies to one group of trans people vs another, it's important to still stand with them against the people who actively want to eradicate us. Moreover, writing any queer person off as persona non grata is only going to further prevent any productive discussion from actually happening.
Direct discussions about inter-community bigotry are important and healthy. Claiming that trans people are anti-trans for having their own opinion in these discussions is not. I know I'm just some shmuck on the internet and this unlikely to actually get read by anyone doing the mark bombing nonetheless change their mind. But you're actively ruining a valuable tool meant to help us stay safe from the people who hate us. Please reconsider.
And if the Mods of this extension are reading this, consider a new policy for filtering out bad faith reviews, or at least indicating when the label is controversial. I know many trans people who are marked as red, and have been asking for people to refute that rating, but the current system still provides too much weight to whichever side submits more votes, when it should at least indicate the uncertainty. - Rated 1 out of 5by Themis, 2 months agoTrans men and intersex individuals airing their grievances about how there is rampant infantilzation of these communities in our queer online spaces is not anti-queer. The word "transandrophobia" being used to describe the horrible treatment the queer community gives to our brothers is not anti-queer.
- Rated 5 out of 5by death2germany, 2 months agothose complaining about it 'incorrectly' marking trans men are simply transmisogynists. going to their blogs on tumblr they're either tmras or cryptoterfs, almost all subscribing to """"transandrophobia"""". this app works as intended, with transfeminists rightfully marked green.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Toby, 2 months agoPinning people as transphobes for talking about intersexism is insane. Same for transmascs being marked unsafe for just talking about their oppression.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Perrio, 2 months agoIt used to be very useful. Now I just keep it as a joke.
It allows people that say super transphobic things to be marked as green. I've seen people who use slurs like "theyfab" "zippertits" etcetera be marked as trans-friendly.
On the flipside, it also marks a lot of trans-masculine people as transphobic for just discussing the ways in which they've been hurt by transphobia. The people I've seen are not transphobic, they're literally speaking against transphobia. It is confusing and I don't understand why they're being marked red.
I've also seen a lot of intersex people and intersex activists be marked as red too, even ones that are trans themselves or are very pro-trans. I'm intersex and this concerns me a lot.
I don't understand why it's like this now. It used to be so much more useful, but now it seems like it's been hacked by transphobes or something.
Huge shame. - Rated 2 out of 5by Skye, 2 months agoTwo stars, as I did use the app for years and found much usage out of it until recently. I appreciate the concept and it did help me filter out transphobic sources, but recently, the extension has been horribly mismanaged and the criteria for marking someone as anti-trans seems to be poorly monitored.
I've also seen explicitly trans-friendly sources get rejected from inclusion in the extension - such as the YouTube channel Two Hot Takes, who have openly voiced their support for transgender people across multiple videos. I have reviewed the criteria for submitting labels multiple times and I have yet to find anything from this channel that would disqualify them from being marked as trans-friendly. This is far from the only example, but one worth bringing up nonetheless.
Updates in recent years do not take into account the needs of the wider trans/nonbinary community. When I first installed this extension around 2018, it was very explicitly inclusive of the wider community, but no longer seems to acknowledge nonbinary and intersex voices. Devs have not properly acknowledged concerns from many users regarding the extension's safety. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18997387, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Himisuda, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by raven, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18734000, 2 months agoThis app has been invaluable to me as a transfem for avoiding unsafe people, including terfs, conservative transphobes, and even transmisogynists within the trans community (who happen to be engaging in targeted behavior towards this app). I like that it doesn't discriminate based on identity - if anyone engages in transmisogynist rhetoric, including trans women, they're marked red, as they should be.
- Rated 1 out of 5by TX, 2 months agoShinigami Eyes Is Failing the Community It Was Meant to Protect
Shinigami Eyes is not being “review bombed.” It is being rightfully called out for perpetuating transphobia, intersexism, and internalized community bias. This extension, once a helpful tool for flagging transphobic or unsafe spaces, is now actively contributing to the very harm it was created to prevent.
Let me be clear: I love and support trans women and transfeminine people. My critique is not rooted in misogyny or transmisogyny, but in a commitment to the safety and dignity of all gender-expansive people—including transmascs, nonbinary people (often dismissively labeled as “theyfabs”), intersex individuals, and our allies.
Too many voices in our community are being silenced by this tool. Transmascs, nonbinary people, and intersex folks are being marked red—“unsafe”—not for any transphobic or bigoted behavior, but simply for speaking out about our lived experiences with oppression and systemic sexism. Meanwhile, accounts that promote violence against transmascs and men, deny nonbinary or intersex identities, or spread hate are still being marked green—“safe.”
This isn’t just individual bias. It’s systemic harm. It’s the erasure of marginalized voices within an already marginalized community. And it defeats the entire purpose of Shinigami Eyes.
To the developers and moderators: you must do better. Learn to recognize transmisogyny (sexism against trans women), transmisandry (sexism against trans men), exorsexism (sexism against nonbinary people), and intersexism (sexism against intersex people). These are real, harmful forces in our community. They deserve to be flagged—not shielded.
Trans women are valid. Trans men are valid. Trans nonbinary people are valid. Trans intersex people are valid. If your plug-in claims to protect gender-expansive people, then it must protect all of us.
Until then, I recommend uninstalling Shinigami Eyes—or, at the very least, disregarding the red and green tags and manually correcting false reports. As it currently functions, it no longer serves the community it once aimed to defend. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18992879, 2 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by monster-energy-guzzler-supreme, 2 months agoapparently intersex people fucking existing is dangerous to trans people but terfs are just fine 💀💀💀💀💀
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18975238, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Chaim, 3 months agoThis extension works as intended! Transmascs who post transmisogynistic content and who are angry about being called out are review-bombing.