Reviews for UltimaDark - The Fastest Dark Mode Extension
UltimaDark - The Fastest Dark Mode Extension by ThomazPom
12 reviews
- Rated 4 out of 5by kzs, 2 months agoMuch faster than Dark Reader—the difference in performance is unreal. Dark Reader was really slowing down browser performance by about 70%. However, some features are somewhat broken, and it lacks some features found in Dark Reader. Website exclusion doesn't work on IP:port websites, and sometimes I get a broken half-dark, half-light theme that requires disabling and re-enabling UltimaDark, then refreshing the page to fix it. Additionally, you can't disable it on all websites by default and just enable manually on light websites like you can with Dark Reader
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18805902, 2 months agoIs it possible to set dark mode to automatic based on the ligh/dark theme on my phone? I cant find it..
Developer response
posted 2 months agoThe Android version of UltimaDark is available primarily to satisfy a few users, but it is not actively tested. However, since it is identical to the browser version, it inherits bug fixes and new features automatically. While we’re happy to hear that some users have it working, please remember that UltimaDark remains a highly niche and experimental project, so your experience may vary.
That said, detection of the system night mode on desktop is already planned. If Android Firefox shares dark theme information with web extensions as Firefox Desktop does—which is very probably the case—then the Android version should inherit this functionality once implemented, with a bit of luck.
Thanks for your understanding and support! - Rated 4 out of 5by Cooper, 2 months agoI thought I would never use dark mode on browsers due to their performance hit. Then I found this.
- Rated 4 out of 5by shadows552, 4 months agoFast performance and pretty universal darkening. However, some elements may be incorrectly darkened or look funky (for example, one note writing on web). Also, excluding websites doesn't seem to work (or at least work consistently).
Developer response
posted 4 months agoThank you for your report !
The extension is still experimental and constantly evolving. To report bugs, share ideas, or track progress, the project’s GitHub page is available. Anyone who wants to be part of the growing community around this project is warmly welcome. Thank you for your patience and support! - Rated 4 out of 5by sloan, 6 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by ykjoy, 7 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by jojojo, 7 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by gsak3l, 7 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by ktpttd, a year agoTruely fastest dark mode!. But I give 4 stars because dark mode is sometime not applied in case: back to previous page, some websites
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13574693, 2 years agoif it handles accented letters and vharacters it'll get thwe 5 star! well done mate. Would be the best if those are okay. :) keep up!
Developer response
posted a year agoThis is a very rare bug occuring on less than 1% of visited websites. I'm currently tracking it down and refreshing the webpage is enough to fix it. Please keep in mind how much UltimaDark is experimental - Rated 4 out of 5by ForeFix, 5 years agoIt seems to work well, with good performance overall, but it indeed breaks some websites. That why it needs a exceptions list feature (if possible with smart segments of url, like: whitelisting .example.com' , 'example.com/subcategorypages' or "subdomainonly.example.com' ), and maybe for later, alternative methods to darken the pages (simple inverse filter, CSS) if the main one doesn't work as expected.
Also, it'd be cool to let the browser highlight with a different color visited links.
Encouragement to the dev!Developer response
posted 5 years agoHi ForeFIx, i added the exceptions list feature, you may want to check the latest version :)
I still don't know yet if i will add alternative methods to darken pages because the very first idea of this addon was to calc a true dark mode for each website (the opposite of setting defaults values or inverting the whole website); but i may change my mind
It still breaks some websites as the code is still experimental