Shinigami Eyes 的评价
Shinigami Eyes 作者: Shinigami Eyes
Fawkes 的评价
(November 25th 2024)Used to love this extension, then the people running it started drinking the radical feminist koolaid, and refuse to have solidarity with their fellow queer folks.
They will allow people who rabidly hate on trans men and intersex identities to be marked Green, but will mark anyone Red who even dares to call out transmedicalism and transphobia if the person who's spouting such rhetoric happens to be a trans woman.
If you are a trans man and you try to talk about how you need access to reproductive health including abortions and birth control, you can be marked Red for 'speaking over trans women'.
If you are a trans woman who spends all your time praising and worshipping other trans woman but say that all trans men need to die or shut up forever and stop 'speaking over women', then you will be marked Green no matter how many trans people who are impacted by this violent rhetoric mark you red for the transphobia you are spouting.
Shinigami eyes used to be good.............. or at least it seemed like it was good. Now it is just a way to knee-jerk silence calls for solidarity within the community, because if people are relying JUST on the colors and not seeing what people are actually saying.... lots of intersex and trans men are being marked deliberately red to try to silence them by framing them as "transmisogynistic" in some way shape or form, when half the time they're literally just talking about their own daily struggles and not even mentioning trans women.
But, of course, if you've only read Whipping Girl as your sole source of "queer essay literature" and you're a trans woman, of *course* you're going to be convinced that Trans Women Are The Most Oppressed People In The World, "what's the harm in wanting all of these marginalized queer men to die based purely on their gender identity as men?" and you'll still be marked green with this extension if you think and say that shit unironically.
EDIT, November 28th 2024:
Well, the Developers have now confirmed they don't give a crap about intersectionality or solidarity, and that the only "intersectionality" that matters to them is if people worship trans woman above all others, even when those trans women are radical feminists spewing violent hatred at every single one of their trans siblings and the greater queer community at large,
including erasing the impact of the AIDS crisis on gay and bisexual men, sodomy laws, and more, creating entire accounts whose sole purpose is to stalk inclusive tags and harass and insult trans activists who don't demonize 50% of the world's population and worse.
if you're somehow all the way back on this page to see this 1 star review and you're wondering why there's so many new 5-star reviews with zero mention of the intersexism and exorsexism, the radical feminists have decided to try to artificially inflate the rating, but too bad for them, radical feminists are always the minority within a movement, and the rest of the community has banded together in solidarity to stand up again biological essentialism,
which is what the radical feminists are standing for, even if they're painting it as somehow "progressive" to demonize trans men and intersex folk for daring to *identify* as men, insisting that they are inherently evil and oppressive and benefit from the patriarchy.....
even when they have not realized yet that they are trans men (so, literally, are still cis women) or are not out of the closet because its not safe to do so (aka, presenting as a cis woman to society) -- rad fems would have you believe these people are somehow inherently dangerous and oppressive because they're men, and that somehow magically changes how they're viewed by society which hates trans people of all flavours, not just trans women as the trans-inclusive radical feminists would have you believe.
They will allow people who rabidly hate on trans men and intersex identities to be marked Green, but will mark anyone Red who even dares to call out transmedicalism and transphobia if the person who's spouting such rhetoric happens to be a trans woman.
If you are a trans man and you try to talk about how you need access to reproductive health including abortions and birth control, you can be marked Red for 'speaking over trans women'.
If you are a trans woman who spends all your time praising and worshipping other trans woman but say that all trans men need to die or shut up forever and stop 'speaking over women', then you will be marked Green no matter how many trans people who are impacted by this violent rhetoric mark you red for the transphobia you are spouting.
Shinigami eyes used to be good.............. or at least it seemed like it was good. Now it is just a way to knee-jerk silence calls for solidarity within the community, because if people are relying JUST on the colors and not seeing what people are actually saying.... lots of intersex and trans men are being marked deliberately red to try to silence them by framing them as "transmisogynistic" in some way shape or form, when half the time they're literally just talking about their own daily struggles and not even mentioning trans women.
But, of course, if you've only read Whipping Girl as your sole source of "queer essay literature" and you're a trans woman, of *course* you're going to be convinced that Trans Women Are The Most Oppressed People In The World, "what's the harm in wanting all of these marginalized queer men to die based purely on their gender identity as men?" and you'll still be marked green with this extension if you think and say that shit unironically.
EDIT, November 28th 2024:
Well, the Developers have now confirmed they don't give a crap about intersectionality or solidarity, and that the only "intersectionality" that matters to them is if people worship trans woman above all others, even when those trans women are radical feminists spewing violent hatred at every single one of their trans siblings and the greater queer community at large,
including erasing the impact of the AIDS crisis on gay and bisexual men, sodomy laws, and more, creating entire accounts whose sole purpose is to stalk inclusive tags and harass and insult trans activists who don't demonize 50% of the world's population and worse.
if you're somehow all the way back on this page to see this 1 star review and you're wondering why there's so many new 5-star reviews with zero mention of the intersexism and exorsexism, the radical feminists have decided to try to artificially inflate the rating, but too bad for them, radical feminists are always the minority within a movement, and the rest of the community has banded together in solidarity to stand up again biological essentialism,
which is what the radical feminists are standing for, even if they're painting it as somehow "progressive" to demonize trans men and intersex folk for daring to *identify* as men, insisting that they are inherently evil and oppressive and benefit from the patriarchy.....
even when they have not realized yet that they are trans men (so, literally, are still cis women) or are not out of the closet because its not safe to do so (aka, presenting as a cis woman to society) -- rad fems would have you believe these people are somehow inherently dangerous and oppressive because they're men, and that somehow magically changes how they're viewed by society which hates trans people of all flavours, not just trans women as the trans-inclusive radical feminists would have you believe.
1,441 条评价
- not much help when it doesnt tell you why someone was marked red. when i come across a youtube channel marked red, and the channel is nothing but innocuous content unrelated to lgbt issues, am i supposed to just believe that? im not going through all their social media to find the truth. transphobia is a heavy accusation, you best have a good reason for it.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16038924, 1 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 NyxieNyxious, 2 天前
- i don't care about tmras and transmisogynists whinging about how they're being bullied for spreading vile bs abt trans women, but i have seen actual 4tranners get marked green, including a dedicated 4tran subreddit. come the fuck on. you wouldn't call an edtwt user a feminist for saying moid.
it's just become a discourse tool now, which is functionally useless for measuring what is and is not actually unsafe for trans people (esp women) to be around. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 20047351, 10 天前
- Like. SO many trans men, non-binary and intersex people are marked as transphobic on this thing for speaking about the oppression they face. So fucked. Also like. a lot of black trans people are marked red for no reason??? Racist and transphobic, avoid at all costs. If you need to check if a page or blog is transphobic, just do the work yourself.
- pretty good. ive been using it for a while and has been largely accurate. im not sure the specifics of the process. but as of late it seems false negatives within the system have been circulating just for people combating transmisogyny. one thing that would help is when somebody is marked red or green (though it would benefit red marks the most) it gives a reason why they were marked such and a link/screenshot to where the person expressed a belief which way. don't use it without checking, especially for red marks, but it can help bring your attention to whether or not a person might be transphobic
- alright I gotta swallow my pride and say that when I made my last review, I was duped. I was poorly informed by the reviews, and after using the plugin and better understanding the actual conversation around the relevant issues, I'm changing my 1 star review to a 5 star review.
Effective plugin, and it feels nice to see green names going around. Recommended if you think it would help you. - 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 20037153, 16 天前I looked at the guidelines when wondering why so many pro-transgender pages are marked red and it sounds like using assigned-gender-at-birth language is being encouraged as "do not mark trans-friendly" due to transmisogyny. Julia Serrano's article on what transmisogyny is does use that language. So am I supposed to mark Julia Serrano as anti-trans??? I'm supposed to flag the woman who coined the term "transmisogyny" as being violently transphobic? That sounds rather counterproductive! Can the developer explain why this is supposed to make sense? Are people flagging others just to see them turn red? Did anti-trans people raid the app, and the mods just can't keep up?
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 20033086, 18 天前I got marked red because I said I headcanoned ralsei as transmasc
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 20031774, 19 天前Insanely transphobic, exorsexist, and intersexist, it's so disappointing
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17758123, 20 天前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 explodingcows54, 21 天前very commonly see transmeds (people who police transness) marked as green and trans men marked as red, with no evidence theyre anti trans or trans friendly. lacks unbiased review.