Imageye - Image downloader 的评价
Imageye - Image downloader 作者: Meagan Amrach, EdwardLee
12 条评价
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18751419, 6 个月前the image downloader is good however the problem is that whenever i try to download an image it hardly works at all, no matter what type of image i tried to put it on, it just does nothing, so hopefully right after i send the review they'll fix that problem and make it better
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18285487, 6 个月前The extension used to work really well. The newer updates added some potentially useful improvements, but most of the time it doesn't download for anything me even though it is finding the images.
Alternatives that currently work for me are Download All Images, Image Picka and Image Max URL, but it some situations Imageye was the best tool for the job (it depends greatly on the site and what images you wish to obtain). I hope the problem gets remedied. I am trying a fresh installation of the extension now. So currently 3 stars. - 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17600697, 7 个月前It is an amazing tool.
Since the 5.10.0 update there is an annoying notification dot every time a page is loaded, even though there are no pictures. This forced me to downgrade back to the old version as it was too distracting. Until this bug is fixed, I am forced to reduce the rating, which is a shame for such a great tool. - It's good, it downloads orginal size image, but it's download image with random name & without extension (.webp, .jpg, etc), to mark certain images & then bulk download all marked images is to hold Ctrl key & click 1st image then click all desired images without holding Ctrl key all the time, it needs to download image web page title name & with extension.
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14285360, 4 年前Should support zipping all images instead of showing multiple download dialogs at once. Other than that works great and I like how it sorts images from bigger to smaller.
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Ainoa de Luis Moura, 4 年前The add-on works, but I used it with Pinterest and it detected way more images than there actually were. I mean, there were like 200 images, but it detected more than 800. Like what?? where did so many come from?? Also it doesn't have too many filters so I couldn't filter all those images.