Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
Review by Firefox user 17033206
Rated 1 out of 5
by Firefox user 17033206, a year agoThis extension is unsafe for intersex and transmasc people. Intersex and transmasc people are being marked red for talking about our experiences, identities, and the specific kinds of bigotry we face. A tool that was originally meant to protect trans people is now being used to divide the lgbt community. Intersex people having intersex specific experiences and identities is not transphobic. Transmasc people talking about how transphobia affects them is not transphobic.
Edit: Telling intersex people we aren't allowed to describe our experiences with language that differs from perisex people is wildly intersexist. Erasing intersex identities and experiences is more in line with the goals of TERFs than a transgender intersex person using language differently than you to describe the differences in their experiences. Also, trans women who were afab calling themselves that doesn't force anyone else to do shit. It's literally just them describing their own lived experience.
Edit: Telling intersex people we aren't allowed to describe our experiences with language that differs from perisex people is wildly intersexist. Erasing intersex identities and experiences is more in line with the goals of TERFs than a transgender intersex person using language differently than you to describe the differences in their experiences. Also, trans women who were afab calling themselves that doesn't force anyone else to do shit. It's literally just them describing their own lived experience.
Developer response
posted a year agoTransmasculine, intersex and xenogender people are welcome.
Just don't use "AFAB trans woman", as it forces trans women to use "AMAB" or "male", aligning your goal with that of TERFs.
Just don't use "AFAB trans woman", as it forces trans women to use "AMAB" or "male", aligning your goal with that of TERFs.
1,292 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by J-P, a few seconds ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18992995, 2 days agokeep in mind all the 1 star reviews are transmisogynists lmao. good addon
- Rated 5 out of 5by jackknifeJaws, 6 days agoa good tool to find out who's a misogynistic (specifically transmisogynistic) weirdo.
im sorry trans women. - Rated 1 out of 5by Lee, 6 days ago"If it sounds too good to be true.": The description claims to target "transphobic/anti-LGBT" content, but it doesn't. Nonbinary, intersex, trans masc, and POC are consistently flagged red. It flags binary white trans women as green, even as they call for the deaths of the aforementioned groups. This is a racist, intersexist, enbyphobic addon. If you identify with any of these groups move on.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Bimny, 7 days agoIf anything this extension doesn't flag enough people. Transmisogynists are under reported. People giving 1 star and claiming its run by TERFs are just mad that they can't harass trans women with impunity and consider men more important than women.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Alex Amelia Pine, 8 days agoThe negative reviews are almost entirely review bombing. I use this all the time, and have never had a problem with false flags. If anything I find things that should be flagged one way or the other going without a flag at all. 9 times out of 10 if you look at the profile that got flagged, you'll find why within a minute of scrolling. The transphobes (usually transmisogynists specifically, but all kinds of transphobes) who get flagged red love to complain about how bigoted and inaccurate this extension is and how it can't be trusted, but then you look and see them spouting the most hateful rhetoric about trans people, plenty of them even trans themself. It's not a tool for exclusively marking transmisogyny, but transmisogyny is transphobia, and when fellow trans people are anti-transfeminist, they rightfully get flagged red. TL;DR it works great and has kept me safe from transphobes, remember to flag accurately and block liberally 👍
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18877928, 13 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by landsharkkidd, 13 days agoI really loved this extension, especially when it came to people who might dog whistle their transphobia. But I've increasingly seen friends/people I follow who are either trans themselves (which, of coure, transphobic trans people exist, but this isn't the case here) or are ally's who get marked as red. This is genuinely heartbreaking, as this extension is something I've been using for years, and it was one of the extension I kept when I moved from Chrome to Firefox. But the lack of updates, and the fact that transphobes can use it against its purposes really sucks. I hope that the devs or someone else can pick up the pieces, but I think I'll uninstall this now.
- Rated 4 out of 5by murasaki, 15 days agoSo far it's been accurate to me... I'll keep reviewer's inputs in mind though and hope to contribute...
- Rated 1 out of 5by eirikr, 16 days agoIt's gotten worse over the years. With the amount of false flags it has now it's worse than useless, it's actively harmful to trans people.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Pluto, 20 days agoThe 5-star reviewers are primarily TERFs, just an FYI.
Anyways, yes, this extention USED to be a valuable tool for rooting out harmful people, but nowadays it has become weaponized by TERFs to belittle, ostracize, and invalidate large portions of the queer community.
False flags are pinned against trans men, transmasculine, intersex, nonbinary, and queer people, as well as people of color. They are marked red simply for speaking about the oppression they face and their own experiences, meanwhile TERFs who openly call for the deaths, detransitioning, and rape of transmasculine people remain green, "safe." Tell me- how that is fair? How can someone like that be a safe and trustworthy person in the queer community?
This is not, and never has been, a tool to "call out misogyny." It is an outdated, jumbled mess of code that TERFs are using to make lists of people that don't agree with them. Don't use this addon. - Rated 1 out of 5by Chara, 21 days agoUsed to be phenomenal, then slowly over time became utterly useless. People whom I followed on social media became marked as red for speaking out against transphobia, whilst people marked green spouted hate. Unbelievably un-moderated and a useless extension in 2025.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19603959, 24 days agoAs it is now, it's very flawed. Many people are falsely marked as transphobic constantly.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17233560, 25 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by spons, a month agodespite what the devs may say, the extension is pro-radfem and anti-trans; trans men, transmascs, and nonbinary people are marked as transphobic for existing and fighting against bigotry. not even the transfems and trans women it seems to be oriented to are safe; if they don't follow the radfem thinking line, even they will get marked red.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Toothless NEO, a month agoI've seen numerous false positives reported here, many on radfems who are openly and repeatedly transphobic towards NonBinary people. I've also seen many NonBinary and intersex people marked red for seemingly no reason.
On top of that this extension doesn't seem to be updated anymore and is causing issues in the UI of certain sites. Noticed graphical glitches in YouTube already. This is definitely an addon to avoid. - Rated 1 out of 5by helloworldp3, a month agothis addon is outright unreliable - trans-friendly sites are marked red (transphobic) while individuals who express hostility towards transmascs and nonbinary people are marked green (trans-friendly.) this addon is completely unreliable, and the bizarre marking of people as red despite not them being transphobic, or even despite them being trans-friendly, makes this extension effectively useless
- Rated 5 out of 5by Teddy55, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Ash the Yggdrasil, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Branwen, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by fnrvy, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by KC O, a month agoi have used this extension since 2019 i think and for many many years i was grateful for it. it helped me identify terfs especially on innocuous posts where they said feminist things i would theoretically agree with (e.g."men have historically been favored by patriarchal society and that's why we need affirmative action"). but i now see this extension being used vindictively against other trans people who just have different opinions, being used to hurt and isolate trans women, men and nb ppl who don't say exactly the right words in the right order. in the shinigami guidelines, even your out of touch granny who is saying accidentally transphobic stuff but still has the spirit is considered "not enough to mark as anti-trans", but people are being marked in red for saying they support both trans women's fight against transmisogyny and other trans ppl's fight against transphobia, if they are seen to be not explicitly saying the transmisogyny is worse. even if that is slightly transmisogynistic, how is that worse than out-of-touch granny? why does the extension mark as green even people who are being actively transphobic about trans men and nb people?
"all trans men deserve to die" is 1. not the same vent as "all men deserve to die" and 2. a transphobic thing to say! and there are people marked as trans friendly who say these things!
i wish the devs would make it consistent-- either no hate speech about any trans groups, and/or a little misguided venting/uniformed statements are okay.
i'm just tired of watching my favorite trans women creators get marked red for no reason