Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
Review by thevdsasff
Rated 1 out of 5
by thevdsasff, 4 days agoused to use this religiously after it first came out and at first it was genuinely useful. now after discovering i'm intersex i try to go to any community for the topic anywhere and everyone is marked red because our discussions of gender and sex don't 100% align with the mods views (which then gets called transmisogynist, when nobody is saying anything of the sort at all). this includes a disproportionate number of transfems, so the claims that simply being transfem will get you marked green are false. i have, however, seen people get marked within days of making an account somewhere *just because they are posting in intersex spaces*. so do with that information what you will. i personally never plan on using the extension again, i'll vet people myself
1,348 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19809155, 12 hours agothe 1-star reviews complaining about transmasc and intersex people getting marked red fail to consider WHY they get marked red (hating trans women)
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17727821, 2 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by mystieneko, 3 days agolots of false flags, intersex people and trans men are almost always marked red while transmisandrists are marked green
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19803232, 4 days agoAbysmal tool if you genuinely care about safety from transphobes. There is a mountain of examples where people who spew intersexist, exorsexist and antitransmasculine hatred 24/7 get to secure their "safe" marking while painting their trans siblings who won't stand for that as the real transphobes.
- Rated 1 out of 5by frac, 4 days agoThey weren't lying, if you're transfem you're instantly flagged as green and if you ever talk about transandrophobia you're instantly flagged as red
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17409768, 6 days agoThis extension- as many others have already pointed out- is no longer accurate or curated in any shape or form. I've used it for many years now, and I just keep catching false flags, especially on tumblr. Not worth the download in 2026
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17939446, 7 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Glossopetrae, 8 days ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Spider-Man, 8 days agoI wish there was a way to see why someone is marked as pro or anti trans. Like a quick description "Posts hateful comments on twitter" or "Regularly Advocates for trans rights during live streams"
- Rated 2 out of 5by rani, 11 days agoWhile at times very good, the community-sourced data on tumblr is prone to bad information from TERFs, false flags from petty infighting, and racism. Often, a trans-friendly and specifically transfeminine blog will be removed by community flagging for having affiliated with any other blog that does not subscribe to specifically radical transfeminist theory. The review process simply cannot keep up with the type of flagging system it has. I also still have concerns over how in the past, attempts to flag exorsexist and otherwise 'truscum' blogs were thrown out, and concerns about exorsexism as a form of transphobia were dismissed for potentially muddying the water in flagging transmisogynists. I'd honestly rate this app at a 3 were it not for its claims of being concerned with transphobia or anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments as a whole, when many reviewers and users will tell you that the extension was always only intended to report transmisogyny.
- Rated 4 out of 5by OscineAves, 13 days agoDespite what other reviews will say there's very few false positives or false negatives if you're a regular person engaging in regular circles.
It won't be a problem unless you engage in chronically online discourse, in which case you can easily use your critical thinking skills to determine for yourself whose on your side and change them to green for yourself. - Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 19304457, 13 days agoon a lot of websites it seems fine, but its completely useless for tumblr. anyone supporting trans men gets marked red.
I don't know why other reviewers are saying this is false, I guess they don't use tumblr? - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19132200, 13 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by DuskTheUmbreon, 21 days agoI've used this extension for years. It's been pretty useful, but lately the flaws have become too rampant to ignore.
A large number of people have been mistagged, with rabidly transphobic authors being marked as trans-friendly (often due to them having been reasonably trans-positive in the past) and people who aren't reasonably able to be described as bigots being marked as transphobic. Of note is that r/XenogendersAndMore is still tagged as transphobic, which is an issue that has been known for years and hasn't been fixed.
This leads me to believe that this extension simply isn't being maintained at all. Any kind of review process that may have once existed clearly no longer does. I'm not sure if it's because the developers got overwhelmed, or just abandoned the project, or whatever, but it appears that there's just no accuracy checking occurring anymore, outside of sheer mass of reports.
Given that, I can simply no longer recommend using this extension. With a lack of any kind of maintenance, quality checking, or anything else to ensure that tags stay accurate, it is far too open to abuse and will likely continue to decline in usefulness. - Rated 4 out of 5by kikuri, 22 days agoits far from flawless. but its nowhere near as bad as the low reviews make it seem; it remains one of the most useful extensions i have
important note: its extremely important to remember that some people may be transphobic but attempt to appear trans-friendly on the surface, which is what the review-bombings are getting wrong (it seems they rather burn down a useful tool then accept that trans people can still be transphobic, even if coated in progressive language). - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19769542, 23 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19767867, 24 days agoit's been co-opted by racists to put down black trans women who speak up about white trans women fyi.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Neulo, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18165305, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by AEB, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14185535, a month agoIt still works mostly as intended. Green links can be hit or miss but red links are accurate 100% of the time in my experience. The 1 star reviews are just mad people are actually starting to get called out on their transmisogyny.
- Rated 1 out of 5by CrimsonCinnamon, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Sepiol, a month ago