Reviews for Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike by Dmitry Selivanov
Review by SnakeUX86
Rated 5 out of 5
by SnakeUX86, 5 years ago5,303 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Rakki9999111, 12 hours agoget
your
SHT
OUT OF MY WEBPAGE.
THERE IS A DISLIKE COUNTER ALREADY. YOU DON'T NEED TO DRAW A NEW WINDOW INSIDE MY WEBPAGE. - Rated 3 out of 5by 748392833, 21 hours agoThe sections of the app's privacy policy that matter to the new permissions:
"On registration, the extension generates a persistent random installation identifier and sends it to the Return
YouTube Dislike API. The identifier is not derived from or linked to a YouTube or Google account, but it is a
persistent identifier and is treated as personal data."
Persistent identifiers can be used to fingerprint users which is likely why it is being treated as personal data here. I am not accusing the author of this, I am just stating that, in the wrong hands, it can be used to fingerprint users.
"When the user submits a Like, Dislike, or vote removal and vote submission is enabled, the extension sends the random installation identifier, video ID, and selected action.
API requests necessarily expose the network IP address and request time. The service uses this information for
security, abuse prevention, aggregate analytics, and operation of the API."
There is more being collected than a random ID and youtube data. Nowhere in the Privacy Policy does it state if this data is being transmitted securely and while it does state that it uses the browser extension to store data and that the data is "processed by the Return YouTube Dislike service and its hosting and
network infrastructure providers" it does not state if, how and how long it is stored on its hosting and
network infrastructure provider. Nor does it state what is stored and if the data is destroyed at any point.
This matters because this information is important to allow users to make an informed choice about installing the app. Those who reside in countries that are governed by the GDPR have a right to request their data. Does the author provide the means to abide by this right? and if so, how may they do this?
"Data is not sold or shared for advertising."
This is good but "Data is not sold or shared in any way" in regards to collected data not associated with Patron or Github would be a better privacy outcome. If you do share data with third parties, please disclose this as users are becoming more and more concerned about privacy and would like to make an informed choice about installing this app.
I have no interest in entertaining any accusations made against the author in regards to the Ukraine/Russian war as the accusations I have seen contain no proof. However, I did see one review stating that the author was "Segregating users" and the author's reply did not deny this, stating "Helping Ukraine defend itself against an aggressor is not “segregation". This is concerning. An IP address can be used to identify a person's origin. I would be interested in knowing how this fits under security and abuse protection?
For the record, I support Ukraine in it's efforts to protect its land and people, and my country both supports and supplies Ukraine in its efforts. I'm not meaning any harm in this review, I am just concerned about privacy.
(One edit was made to correctly quote a statement made by the author.) - Rated 1 out of 5by GHOSTLYGUNK, 2 days agothere's no world in which you need MY PERSONALLY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION. fuck off
- Rated 1 out of 5by chandlerbigrock, 2 days agoi don't care if it works - there is NO reason for this app to keep asking for more permissions, and asking for PII was the last straw
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 20281653, 2 days agoThe enshittification has hit this extension as well... What do you need my personal information for?!
Such a shame... - Rated 1 out of 5by gutfyut, 3 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by ViscoseComb24, 3 days agoIt's nice to be able to see dislikes again. There was seemingly no good reason to remove them from the public eye to begin with, aside from restricting information to the viewer. Glad this extension exists.
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 20240328, 3 days agoI still use old version for now, so far work just fine with some kink. Pretty sure dev are tired to death to remind over and over but people can't help to be skeptical and so do I. Just promise that those data just for function or whatever. It would be ashamed if someone found out you secretly selling data.
Edit: need to clarify "Helping Ukraine defend itself against an aggressor is not “segregation.”" does that mean you know user's nationality? by how exactly? surely not IP address.
I don't know what you going to do with those data and since i live in a country that does support russia, then i just can go fuck myself put me on your blacklist. UNINSTALL - Rated 1 out of 5by Shelegna, 5 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Bart, 6 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by だてんし, 6 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Damian, 7 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14858869, 8 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Fluboxer, 8 days agoThis extension requires rights to collect (and possibly sell) user data. Author of this extension openly supports Ukrainian nationalists
If you were on the Internet for the past ~4 years and have interacted with people that do this, then you know they can not be trusted. Especially when they output an update that requires PII and first thing you see is their website poping up to sell your premium features originating from said PII usageDeveloper response
posted 8 days agoThe only data it collects is your random ID (to count dislikes) and dislikes.
I do not support nationalist of any kind, including russian-imerialist ones who decided to invade a sovereign country. - Rated 3 out of 5by idx_zero, 11 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 20256138, 11 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13903561, 12 days ago
Developer response
posted 12 days agoSorry it hasn’t been working for you.
RYD hasn’t changed how it handles your data. What changed is how Mozilla labels these permissions - not what the extension does with your data.
Here’s the same problem discussed by Ajay, the author of SponsorBlock and DeArrow:
https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/the-new-data-transmission-permissions-seem-to-be-misleading-to-users/149410
The extension is actually recommended by Mozilla, so they do not consider it harmful or dangerous.
The extension only uses the data it needs to show dislikes and count votes.
Its site permissions cover YouTube and its own API at returnyoutubedislikeapi.com. RYD doesn’t read other websites, and these site permissions cannot be used to access them.
Personally identifiable information - RYD’s randomly generated, anonymous user ID, used to count votes. This isn’t your Google or YouTube account.
Browsing activity - opening the next YouTube video, so the extension can send its video ID and fetch the new dislike count.
Website content - things like the visible like count, which helps calculate dislike estimates.
Website activity - clicking Like or Dislike.
Again, this is about YouTube activity. The extension isn’t watching everything you do across the internet - it simply can’t do that with these site permissions.
The new labels sound scary, but they don’t give the extension access to more websites.
RYD is open source, so you can see how it works: https://github.com/Anarios/return-youtube-dislike- Rated 1 out of 5by SimoX9, 13 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Arthur, 13 days agoDEV DOES NOT COLLECT Personally identifiable information. Nothing has changed in how this extension works.
Check the open source project page's discussion section on Github for more details.Developer response
posted 12 days agoThanks for taking the time to leave a review.
RYD hasn’t changed how it handles your data. What changed is how Mozilla labels these permissions - not what the extension does with your data.
Here’s the same problem discussed by Ajay, the author of SponsorBlock and DeArrow:
https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/the-new-data-transmission-permissions-seem-to-be-misleading-to-users/149410
The extension only uses the data it needs to show dislikes and count votes.
Its site permissions cover YouTube and its own API at returnyoutubedislikeapi.com. RYD doesn’t read other websites, and these site permissions cannot be used to access them.
Personally identifiable information - RYD’s randomly generated, anonymous user ID, used to count votes. This isn’t your Google or YouTube account.
Browsing activity - opening the next YouTube video, so the extension can send its video ID and fetch the new dislike count.
Website content - things like the visible like count, which helps calculate dislike estimates.
Website activity - clicking Like or Dislike.
Again, this is about YouTube activity. The extension isn’t watching everything you do across the internet - it simply can’t do that with these site permissions.
The new labels sound scary, but they don’t give the extension access to more websites.
RYD is open source, so you can see how it works: https://github.com/Anarios/return-youtube-dislike - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 20250738, 13 days agoUsed to be good. New update requires rights to collect and sell my data.
Developer response
posted 12 days agoThanks for the feedback about the permission labels.
RYD hasn’t changed how it handles your data. What changed is how Mozilla labels these permissions - not what the extension does with your data.
Ajay, the author of SponsorBlock and DeArrow, discusses the same problem here:
https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/the-new-data-transmission-permissions-seem-to-be-misleading-to-users/149410
The extension is actually recommended by Mozilla, so they do not consider it harmful or dangerous.
RYD only uses the data needed to show dislikes and count votes.
Its site permissions cover YouTube and its own API at returnyoutubedislikeapi.com. RYD doesn’t read other websites, and these site permissions cannot be used to access them.
Personally identifiable information - RYD’s randomly generated, anonymous user ID, used to count votes. This isn’t your Google or YouTube account.
Browsing activity - moving to the next YouTube video, so the extension can send its video ID and fetch the new dislike count.
Website content - things like the visible like count, which helps work out dislike estimates.
Website activity - clicking Like or Dislike.
Again, this concerns activity on YouTube. The extension isn’t watching everything you do across the internet - these site permissions simply don’t allow that.
Those new labels can sound scary, but they don’t allow the extension to access more websites.
RYD’s source code is public, so you can check how it works: https://github.com/Anarios/return-youtube-dislike - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 5693218, 13 days agoIt requests permission to collect additional data for the purpose of segregating users based on their nationality (according to information on the extension's website). It performs its intended functions in the standard manner, drawing upon a database shared with other similar extensions.
Developer response
posted 11 days agoHelping Ukraine defend itself against an aggressor is not “segregation.” - Rated 1 out of 5by Robin, 13 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by aa, 14 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 20247254, 14 days ago