Reviews for Video DownloadHelper
Video DownloadHelper by vdh
Review by Ferenc Strangl
Rated 1 out of 5
by Ferenc Strangl, a year agoFizetős lett. Ha nem veszed meg, akkor egy negyed képernyőnyi QR kód lesz a bal alsó sarokban. Azt is bánom, hogy valaha támogatást adtam. Törölve. Valószínüleg a firefoxtól is búcsúzom, egyre lassabb és jó pár dolgot nem kezel egyes honlapokon.
He became paid. If you don't buy it, there will be a quarter-screen QR code in the lower left corner. I also regret ever giving support. Deleted. I'll probably say goodbye to firefox too, it's getting slower and doesn't handle quite a few things on some websites.
He became paid. If you don't buy it, there will be a quarter-screen QR code in the lower left corner. I also regret ever giving support. Deleted. I'll probably say goodbye to firefox too, it's getting slower and doesn't handle quite a few things on some websites.
40,480 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16879634, 2 hours ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Mosef, 2 hours ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19628785, 2 hours ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19628713, 3 hours agoPuts a giant watermark on the downloaded videos, uninstalled.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14504258, 6 hours agoIs perfect to download a serie or any content and with the smart naming feature, the task of naming is very easear
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 15930469, 8 hours agoI can recommend this video only to those who download many videos in large batches and need a GUI, because ffmpeg downloads much faster, while having an ability to merge subtitles into a .mkv file among many other things.
- Rated 1 out of 5by --a, 11 hours agoVersion 10 is completely broken. Had to revert to the old one. V10 cannot download any large videos, esp. with typical free streaming servers which often have network issues. The older versions can deal with that (not perfectly, but eventually it works). There are lots more new bugs. And I really don't need the UI to be redesigned all the time, esp. when that breaks the most important feature.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19628200, 12 hours ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Gunstr, 13 hours ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15497104, 15 hours ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by SU-80, 15 hours ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15533885, 16 hours ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by dorayakichan, a day ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19616798, a day ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13626950, a day agoworks great for me ! easy to use and fast , at some point a few years ago it didnt work in some sites , but other than that it is a great addon !!
- Rated 5 out of 5by a v a, 2 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by MagicMau, 2 days agov10 breaks lot of sites. reverting back to v9, everything works again
- Rated 5 out of 5by maro, 2 days agoGreat addon. I use it for years with just occasional trouble usually solved by update.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 12868711, 2 days agoLike others I have reverted to Version 9.5.0.2 and will cease all updates going forward
- Rated 1 out of 5by Me232, 2 days agoПосле обновления не находит видео на страницах!Например на vkvideo.ru,просто надпись "Ожидание видео" и всё.Жаль,хорошо работало,но разработчики решили сломать...
- Rated 1 out of 5by Ducky5264, 2 days agoCe n'est pas la première fois que je modifie mon évaluation et de nouveau pour une MàJ qui ne sert à rien hormis dérouter les utilisateurs. Cette MàJ n'est ni plus ni moins qu'un retour en arrière et pas franchement réussi. Mais pourquoi donc casser une extension qui fonctionne bien par une bouse sortie d'on se sait où? Que diable a-t-il pris au développeur de faire une telle MàJ ? Il y aurait un quota de MàJ à publier quitte à retirer une version qui fonctionne bien? Pour ma part, je reviens à la version précédente et je bloque les MàJ en attendant des jours meilleurs.
---------------------------------------
This is not the first time that I have changed my evaluation and again for an update that serves no purpose except to confuse users. This update is nothing more or less than a step backwards and not really successful. But why break an extension that works well with a dung from who knows where? What the hell did it take for the developer to do such an update? Would there be a quota of updates to be published, even if it means removing a version that works well? For my part, I"m going back to the previous version and I"m blocking the updates while waiting for better days.